Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 814942" data-attributes="member: 10086">This isn’t pointed at any particular poster...I don’t think it’s as black and white as some would make it to be. It’s within reasonIf the draft is particularly deep at a particular position grouping a team is unlikely to keep drafting at 1 position group each round just to get the “BAP” that round. As an exaggerated effect, we’re highly likely to NOT draft 3 in a row at the DT position when we’re desperately needing an OLB or S.Also as someone pointed out (Poker?) as the board gets picked over the BAP variance diminished as far as a point value. It’s far more likely you’d make an exception picks 1-16 vs picks 101-116.I would go further to define the BAP theory as.... “if all things are equal within a reasonable threshold” you go BAP. That doesn’t mean drive your team off a cliff before you consider going need either.My advice would be to have the team’s Actuary close by.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 497 (members: 0, guests: 497)