Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Wide Receiver Options
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Heyjoe4" data-source="post: 962145" data-attributes="member: 13032"><p>That's fine if Watkins can produce and is a #2 or even a #3 WR. Then the question is who takes the #1 and/or #2 spot?</p><p></p><p>I'm just looking at this from an experience standpoint. Lazard has been a reliable #3 WR. No more, no less. Does the departure of Adams give him a chance to move up? Sure, it he can take it. Same for Watkins.</p><p></p><p>I think Watkins emerges as the #1 WR, with Lazard #2. It could be reversed - but based on their experience, either one could rise to be the #1 WR. I just think it will be Watkins.</p><p></p><p>It might be better to just look at total passing yards and TDs this year, without regard (yet) to who is on the receiving end. So I'm optimistically looking for 4.000 yards passing, and 35 to 40 TDs. That's aggressive, I know. But the Packers have Rodgers, some decent veterans and some promising rookies. The RB's will see more passes, and the TE group probably contributes 800 yards and 5 to 7 TDs. That's about the best I can break it down until we see how guys react when the bright lights come on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Heyjoe4, post: 962145, member: 13032"] That's fine if Watkins can produce and is a #2 or even a #3 WR. Then the question is who takes the #1 and/or #2 spot? I'm just looking at this from an experience standpoint. Lazard has been a reliable #3 WR. No more, no less. Does the departure of Adams give him a chance to move up? Sure, it he can take it. Same for Watkins. I think Watkins emerges as the #1 WR, with Lazard #2. It could be reversed - but based on their experience, either one could rise to be the #1 WR. I just think it will be Watkins. It might be better to just look at total passing yards and TDs this year, without regard (yet) to who is on the receiving end. So I'm optimistically looking for 4.000 yards passing, and 35 to 40 TDs. That's aggressive, I know. But the Packers have Rodgers, some decent veterans and some promising rookies. The RB's will see more passes, and the TE group probably contributes 800 yards and 5 to 7 TDs. That's about the best I can break it down until we see how guys react when the bright lights come on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Pkrjones
The General
Jonty
Latest posts
Free Agency Thread
Latest: Pkrjones
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Packers Top 30 Prospect Visits
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
11 minutes ago
Draft Talk
H
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Heyjoe4
35 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Prospects you are A LOT higher on than consensus…
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 1:19 AM
Draft Talk
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: PackFan2
Yesterday at 8:28 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Wide Receiver Options
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top