Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Oannes" data-source="post: 149266" data-attributes="member: 816">However relevant you choose to make me is completely your call.   I question most Packer fans, shoot any fans, OBJECTIVITY. I'm sensing that OBJECTIVITY=ARROGANCE and IRRELEVANCE.   That is your view.  The understanding here leaves a lot to be desired.   Is that arrogant to say?  That is my honest opinion.  I don't feel superior to any of you, but I promise you I'm a lot more objective in my subjective opinion. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" data-shortname=":)" />I love the math like summary of LB positions and the point out that SAM is what was being referenced.  Did you think I didn't know that SAM was referenced in the article?  I'm the one who read it and the copy and pasted the parts I wanted.   Barnett was only a consideration for SAM last season when Hawk arrived.  Why?  Barnett had previously been thought of to move to Will for all his previous years...yes DUE TO SIZE, which I pointed out in an earlier post (wish people would read)  and due to the ability to ALLOW HIM TO MAKE MORE PLAYS.   I don't understand how you don't get this.  Why would you consider moving Barnett to a different position if he was so frickin productive at Mike?   You certainly don't consider moving him to Will to make his numbers drop...he said in the article I used that Mike and Will are the productive spots.  I get that.   Will is the spot that a guy is more likely to be unblocked, hence, ABLE TO MAKE MORE PLAYS.   Geez.  I'm at a loss.  I've told you the way it works and you continually bash and make counter arguments that are irrelevant.    Just so we don't have to go through this again...  +++++IMPORTANT++++++   Before anyone comes here and says why would they move Barnett to SAM then, you were saying WILL.    Barnett was always talked about being moved to Will BEFORE Hawk's arrival.  Hawk has the greater skill set/athleticism therefore Hawk was slated to be in the PLAYMAKING POSITION because of his gifts being greater than Barnett's.  The ONLY time Barnett was talked about being moved to Sam was AFTER HAWK CAME.   Barnett was our biggest playmaker and they wanted him to be more of one at WIL.  Now, Hawk is the one thought best equipped to be the playmaker and that is why he is the WIL.  It is NOT to be less productive than the Mike.</blockquote>

Verification

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 771 (members: 0, guests: 771)

Latest posts

Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
- Latest: OldSchool101
- Yesterday at 11:12 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
- Latest: tynimiller
- Yesterday at 10:57 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
- Latest: Pokerbrat2000
- Yesterday at 3:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
- Latest: Pokerbrat2000
- Yesterday at 2:00 PM
Movies and Entertainment
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
- Latest: Magooch
- Yesterday at 11:43 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum