Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why this draft made no sense at all
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pack93z" data-source="post: 149217" data-attributes="member: 288"><p>No doubt about that... Urlacher is a rare breed, gifted physically. But one thing he has to have, like Barnett is clear space. He struggles to shed blocks, this is where Hawks game is different. He can fight off the blocks with the more stout frame. <strong>Both are gamers and sell out every play. </strong></p><p></p><p>The reason Urlacher had such an impact is that he wasn't confined by abilities to the box as much as say Hawk so far. Hawk isn't as fluid in pass coverage, but is every bit as physical. My opinion on Hawk is that if you had him in the middle he would be more dominant. An enforcer type. But then you displace another productive member of the defense. </p><p></p><p>Hawk was learning to play a position and scheme that he wasn't accustomed to playing where in coverage he got more than 10 yards deep. In college he played mostly a short zone with everything in front of him. So the Wil spot is new and foreign where Urlacher was moved all over in college and transitioned in faster. </p><p></p><p>That is my opinion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pack93z, post: 149217, member: 288"] No doubt about that... Urlacher is a rare breed, gifted physically. But one thing he has to have, like Barnett is clear space. He struggles to shed blocks, this is where Hawks game is different. He can fight off the blocks with the more stout frame. [b]Both are gamers and sell out every play. [/b] The reason Urlacher had such an impact is that he wasn't confined by abilities to the box as much as say Hawk so far. Hawk isn't as fluid in pass coverage, but is every bit as physical. My opinion on Hawk is that if you had him in the middle he would be more dominant. An enforcer type. But then you displace another productive member of the defense. Hawk was learning to play a position and scheme that he wasn't accustomed to playing where in coverage he got more than 10 yards deep. In college he played mostly a short zone with everything in front of him. So the Wil spot is new and foreign where Urlacher was moved all over in college and transitioned in faster. That is my opinion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:12 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 10:57 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 3:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 2:00 PM
Movies and Entertainment
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Magooch
Yesterday at 11:43 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why this draft made no sense at all
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top