Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why this draft made no sense at all
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="warhawk" data-source="post: 149187" data-attributes="member: 431"><p>Pyle Wrote:</p><p></p><p>Thats what I was saying. It doesn't actually mean Hawks a beast. He is no doubt above average by far and has some nice tools but because his numbers are better than Barnett's doesn't really mean much besides Barnetts not making the plays and leaving Hawk to clean em up.</p></blockquote><p></p><p>I think MM should game plan it so EVERYBODY else misses the tackles and Hawk get's them all but, and here's the challenge, we CONTINUE TO IMPROVE OUR RUSHING D STATS like we so dramatically did last year.</p><p></p><p>Maybe, just maybe, TT was on to something when he figured maybe Digg's and Lenon had to go and we probably needed some real NFL linebackers since they play kind of a critical role in both the run and pass defense in our scheme.</p><p></p><p>Did I not see somewhere that AFTER they decided to leave Hawk in there on passing downs that our whole pass defense began it's climb out of below dead bottom?</p><p></p><p>I forgot. We're talking strickly total tackles here which equates to EVERYTHING good a player does.</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="warhawk, post: 149187, member: 431"] Pyle Wrote: Thats what I was saying. It doesn't actually mean Hawks a beast. He is no doubt above average by far and has some nice tools but because his numbers are better than Barnett's doesn't really mean much besides Barnetts not making the plays and leaving Hawk to clean em up.[/quote] I think MM should game plan it so EVERYBODY else misses the tackles and Hawk get's them all but, and here's the challenge, we CONTINUE TO IMPROVE OUR RUSHING D STATS like we so dramatically did last year. Maybe, just maybe, TT was on to something when he figured maybe Digg's and Lenon had to go and we probably needed some real NFL linebackers since they play kind of a critical role in both the run and pass defense in our scheme. Did I not see somewhere that AFTER they decided to leave Hawk in there on passing downs that our whole pass defense began it's climb out of below dead bottom? I forgot. We're talking strickly total tackles here which equates to EVERYTHING good a player does. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
PackerDNA
RepStar15
Schultz
jack6615
Half Empty
Guacamole
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: PikeBadger
25 minutes ago
Draft Talk
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: PikeBadger
34 minutes ago
Draft Talk
H
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 7:04 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: milani
Today at 6:56 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:50 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why this draft made no sense at all
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top