Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pack93z" data-source="post: 149109" data-attributes="member: 288">The only real complaint on Harrell, which has yet to be proven one way or another, is can he stay healthy and show the same skills of his junior year. But on talent alone, we won't really know until camps start.The thing I don't get... is all 4 of the first day picks didn't have more than one productive year in college... whether by injury or just plain productivity.Harrell - InjuryJackson - Injury & buried on depth chartJones... Great Senior year... but comming into it, a possible starterRouse - productive junior year and disappointing senior year.Yet in the second day.. minus Wynn... we draft consistent productive players... Shouldn't it be the other way around?As far as the lack of trade of with the Browns, could have took that deal, then traded back into the 1st round like the Cowpokes did. Even if we gave up our 1st next year... which should be lower in the round then the lowly Browns. But then we would have needed a trading partner for that to happen.But regardless, if Harrell is what he was his Junior year, we likely got a top 10 player in the end.</blockquote>

Total: 731 (members: 6, guests: 725)