Page Time: 0.1530s

Memory: 6.7490 MB (Peak: 8.2201 MB)

Queries (40, time: 0.0299s, 19.5%)

  1. SELECT cache_value
    FROM xf_permission_combination
    WHERE permission_combination_id = ?
    Params: 1
    Run Time: 0.000134
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLExf_permission_combinationconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
  2. SELECT thread.*
    	,
    		user.gender, user.avatar_date, user.gravatar,
    		NULL AS thread_read_date,
    		0 AS thread_reply_banned,
    		0 AS thread_is_watched,
    		'' AS draft_message, NULL AS draft_extra
    FROM xf_thread AS thread
    
    		LEFT JOIN xf_user AS user ON
    			(user.user_id = thread.user_id)
    WHERE thread.thread_id = ?
    Params: 9696
    Run Time: 0.001345
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLEthreadconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLEuserconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
  3. SELECT node.*, forum.*
    	,
    	permission.cache_value AS node_permission_cache,
    		NULL AS forum_read_date
    FROM xf_forum AS forum
    INNER JOIN xf_node AS node ON (node.node_id = forum.node_id)
    
    	LEFT JOIN xf_permission_cache_content AS permission
    		ON (permission.permission_combination_id = 1
    			AND permission.content_type = 'node'
    			AND permission.content_id = forum.node_id)
    WHERE node.node_id = ?
    Params: 20
    Run Time: 0.000267
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLEforumconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLEnodeconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLEpermissionconstPRIMARYPRIMARY35const,const,const1 
  4. SELECT EWRporta2_articles.*, xf_thread.*, xf_post.*, xf_user.*, EWRporta2_authors.*
    FROM EWRporta2_articles
    	INNER JOIN xf_thread ON (xf_thread.thread_id = EWRporta2_articles.thread_id)
    	INNER JOIN xf_post ON (xf_post.post_id = xf_thread.first_post_id)
    	LEFT JOIN xf_user ON (xf_user.user_id = xf_thread.user_id)
    	LEFT JOIN EWRporta2_authors ON (EWRporta2_authors.user_id = xf_thread.user_id)
    WHERE EWRporta2_articles.thread_id = ?
    Params: 9696
    Run Time: 0.000793
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLE       Impossible WHERE noticed after reading const tables
  5. SELECT EWRporta2_articles.*, EWRporta2_authors.*, xf_thread.*, xf_post.*, xf_user.*
    FROM xf_thread
    	INNER JOIN xf_post ON (xf_post.post_id = xf_thread.first_post_id)
    	LEFT JOIN xf_user ON (xf_user.user_id = xf_thread.user_id)
    	LEFT JOIN EWRporta2_authors ON (EWRporta2_authors.user_id = xf_thread.user_id)
    	LEFT JOIN EWRporta2_articles ON (EWRporta2_articles.thread_id = xf_thread.thread_id)
    WHERE xf_thread.thread_id = ?
    Params: 9696
    Run Time: 0.000731
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLExf_threadconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLExf_postconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLExf_userconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLEEWRporta2_authorsconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const0unique row not found
    SIMPLEEWRporta2_articlesconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const0unique row not found
  6. SELECT post.*
    	,
    		bb_code_parse_cache.parse_tree AS message_parsed, bb_code_parse_cache.cache_version AS message_cache_version,
    		user.*, IF(user.username IS NULL, post.username, user.username) AS username,
    		user_profile.*,
    		user_privacy.*,
    		signature_parse_cache.parse_tree AS signature_parsed, bb_code_parse_cache.cache_version AS signature_cache_version,
    		session_activity.view_date AS last_view_date,
    		0 AS like_date
    		,(select sum(count_received) from dark_postrating_count where user_id = post.user_id and rating in (1,2,4,5,6,7,8,10)) as positive_rating_count
    	
    		,(select sum(count_received) from dark_postrating_count where user_id = post.user_id and rating in (14,11,12,13)) as negative_rating_count
    	
    		,(select sum(count_received) from dark_postrating_count where user_id = post.user_id and rating in (3,9)) as neutral_rating_count
    	,
    pr_cache.rating_cache,
    pr2.rating
    FROM xf_post AS post
    
    		LEFT JOIN xf_bb_code_parse_cache AS bb_code_parse_cache ON
    			(bb_code_parse_cache.content_type = 'post' AND bb_code_parse_cache.content_id = post.post_id)
    		LEFT JOIN xf_user AS user ON
    			(user.user_id = post.user_id)
    		LEFT JOIN xf_user_profile AS user_profile ON
    			(user_profile.user_id = post.user_id)
    		LEFT JOIN xf_user_privacy AS user_privacy ON
    			(user_privacy.user_id = post.user_id)
    		LEFT JOIN xf_bb_code_parse_cache AS signature_parse_cache ON
    			(signature_parse_cache.content_type = 'signature' AND signature_parse_cache.content_id = post.user_id)
    		LEFT JOIN xf_session_activity AS session_activity ON
    			(post.user_id > 0 AND session_activity.user_id = post.user_id AND session_activity.unique_key = CAST(post.user_id AS BINARY))
    left join dark_postrating_post_cache pr_cache ON (post.post_id = pr_cache.post_id)
    left join dark_postrating pr2 on (post.post_id = pr2.post_id and pr2.user_id = 0)
    WHERE post.thread_id = ?
    	 AND (post.position >= 225 AND post.position < 250) 
    	AND (post.message_state IN ('visible'))
    ORDER BY post.position ASC, post.post_date ASC
    Params: 9696
    Run Time: 0.003564
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    PRIMARYpostrangethread_id_post_date,thread_id_positionthread_id_position8 24Using where; Using filesort
    PRIMARYbb_code_parse_cacheeq_refcontent_type_idcontent_type_id31const,packerfo_maindb.post.post_id1 
    PRIMARYusereq_refPRIMARYPRIMARY4packerfo_maindb.post.user_id1 
    PRIMARYuser_profileeq_refPRIMARYPRIMARY4packerfo_maindb.post.user_id1 
    PRIMARYuser_privacyeq_refPRIMARYPRIMARY4packerfo_maindb.post.user_id1 
    PRIMARYsignature_parse_cacheeq_refcontent_type_idcontent_type_id31const,packerfo_maindb.post.user_id1 
    PRIMARYsession_activityeq_refPRIMARYPRIMARY22packerfo_maindb.post.user_id,func1 
    PRIMARYpr_cacheeq_refPRIMARYPRIMARY4packerfo_maindb.post.post_id1 
    PRIMARYpr2eq_refpost_id_user_id,post_id_rating,user_id_ratingpost_id_user_id8packerfo_maindb.post.post_id,const1 
    DEPENDENT SUBQUERYdark_postrating_countrefuser_id_ratinguser_id_rating4packerfo_maindb.post.user_id4Using where
    DEPENDENT SUBQUERYdark_postrating_countrefuser_id_ratinguser_id_rating4packerfo_maindb.post.user_id4Using where
    DEPENDENT SUBQUERYdark_postrating_countrefuser_id_ratinguser_id_rating4packerfo_maindb.post.user_id4Using where
  7. INSERT DELAYED INTO xf_thread_view
    	(thread_id)
    VALUES
    	(?)
    Params: 9696
    Run Time: 0.000113
  8. UPDATE xf_thread SET hot_count = hot_count + 1 WHERE thread_id = 9696
    Run Time: 0.001978
  9. SELECT thread.*
    	,
    		0 AS thread_reply_banned
    FROM xf_thread AS thread
    
    WHERE thread.thread_id = ?
    Params: 9696
    Run Time: 0.000449
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLEthreadconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
  10. SELECT node.*, forum.*
    	,
    	permission.cache_value AS node_permission_cache
    FROM xf_forum AS forum
    INNER JOIN xf_node AS node ON (node.node_id = forum.node_id)
    
    	LEFT JOIN xf_permission_cache_content AS permission
    		ON (permission.permission_combination_id = 1
    			AND permission.content_type = 'node'
    			AND permission.content_id = forum.node_id)
    WHERE node.node_id = ?
    Params: 20
    Run Time: 0.000280
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLEforumconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLEnodeconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLEpermissionconstPRIMARYPRIMARY35const,const,const1 
  11. SELECT *
    FROM xf_ignore_thread
    WHERE user_id = ?
    	AND thread_id = ?
    Params: 0, 9696
    Run Time: 0.000089
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLExf_ignore_threadrefuser_threaduser_thread8const,const1 
  12. SELECT EWRporta2_articles.*, xf_thread.*, xf_post.*, xf_user.*, EWRporta2_authors.*
    FROM EWRporta2_articles
    	INNER JOIN xf_thread ON (xf_thread.thread_id = EWRporta2_articles.thread_id)
    	INNER JOIN xf_post ON (xf_post.post_id = xf_thread.first_post_id)
    	LEFT JOIN xf_user ON (xf_user.user_id = xf_thread.user_id)
    	LEFT JOIN EWRporta2_authors ON (EWRporta2_authors.user_id = xf_thread.user_id)
    WHERE EWRporta2_articles.thread_id = ?
    Params: 9696
    Run Time: 0.000811
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLE       Impossible WHERE noticed after reading const tables
  13. SELECT EWRporta2_articles.*, EWRporta2_authors.*, xf_thread.*, xf_post.*, xf_user.*
    FROM xf_thread
    	INNER JOIN xf_post ON (xf_post.post_id = xf_thread.first_post_id)
    	LEFT JOIN xf_user ON (xf_user.user_id = xf_thread.user_id)
    	LEFT JOIN EWRporta2_authors ON (EWRporta2_authors.user_id = xf_thread.user_id)
    	LEFT JOIN EWRporta2_articles ON (EWRporta2_articles.thread_id = xf_thread.thread_id)
    WHERE xf_thread.thread_id = ?
    Params: 9696
    Run Time: 0.000681
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLExf_threadconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLExf_postconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLExf_userconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLEEWRporta2_authorsconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const0unique row not found
    SIMPLEEWRporta2_articlesconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const0unique row not found
  14. INSERT INTO xf_session_activity
    	(user_id, unique_key, ip, controller_name, controller_action, view_state, params, view_date, robot_key)
    VALUES
    	(?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
    	ip = VALUES(ip),
    	controller_name = VALUES(controller_name),
    	controller_action = VALUES(controller_action),
    	view_state = VALUES(view_state),
    	params = VALUES(params),
    	view_date = VALUES(view_date),
    	robot_key = VALUES(robot_key)
    Params: 0, , , XenForo_ControllerPublic_Thread, Index, valid, thread_id=9696&page=10, 1469807971,
    Run Time: 0.001136
  15. SELECT title, phrase_text
    FROM xf_phrase_compiled
    WHERE language_id = ?
    	AND title IN ('freepro_menu_tickets', 'freepro_menu_schedule', 'freepro_menu_roster', 'freepro_menu_draft')
    Params: 1
    Run Time: 0.000153
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLExf_phrase_compiledrangePRIMARYPRIMARY106 4Using where
  16. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149239, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:730:"Urlacher's numbers are down since Briggs became the player he did? Right now, Lance Briggs is as good as he's ever been... I mean this past season. Lance Briggs did NOT hurt Urlacher's numbers, in fact, Urlacher had 141 tackles last season...the SECOND most in his 7 year career. Briggs, meanwhile, had the most tackles of his career last season. So, Urlacher's tackles did NOT go down because of Briggs emergence. Go compare all the seasons. You will find it's inaccurate to say Briggs hurt Urlacher's numbers. But... AJ Hawk's arrival certainly hurt Barnett's numbers. My Jennings vs. Boldin was for effect. What is asinine is continually arguing a point that was lost before it was argued in the first place.";}}i:1;s:690:" Lance Briggs emerged as a very good player(which is what Hawk is) in 2004 with 126 tackles. Urlacher hurt that year playing 9 games had 70 tackles. Thats a pace of 124 tackles. Urlacher then had 121 tackles in 2005 with Briggs at 107. Urlacher had a very good year last year as did Briggs. They've also had three years together(which barnett and hawk have not). Again when in this system has the WLB EVER been the focus of the defense? If anything with all of the nickle packages the Packers ran last year it was both linebackers that were the focus. You're putting words in peoples mouths. It is not the majority's belief that Hawk was "more impactful" but rather comparable.";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000908
  17. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149240, a:1:{i:0;s:672:"Tommy Maddox was HORRIBLE... He wouldn't be good with any team. How'd the Cutler for Plummer move work out for Denver? Not good. The odds favor Brady Quinn and the poor Cleveland team struggling mightily in 2008. I have a strong opinion on what is going to happen. What is yours? Or is it just more fun to mock someone who stands up and takes a strong stand. Go on record. Let's hear what you think of Clevelands Win/Loss prospects in '08. What is your problem with me. Nobody else seems to have the issues you do. Is it because I don't have any Packer helmets yellowed next to my moniker and am just a Waterboy and you're a 2nd round pick?";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000607
  18. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149241, a:1:{i:0;s:35:"Ha, waterboy. ...ive got nothin.";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000639
  19. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149242, a:1:{i:0;s:272:"I'm glad we have Hawk, but I'd prefer Urlacher. If both guys were the same age I'm sure all 32 teams would rather have Urlacher. I don't want to continue arguing. I'll let it go with your comparable argument without getting too specific as to what you might mean.";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000325
  20. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149243, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:550:"Nick Barnett's tackle numbers were the LOWEST of his NFL career with Hawk at Weakside LB. That's right...LOWEST. Nick Barnett should improve his numbers if a MLB is the focus of the defense with a great Weakside backer. Please, explain to me how MLB is the focus of our scheme and make it fit with the fact Barnett had 105 tackles last year...7 tackles lower than his rookie year. This D is set up for Hawk to make plays. We picked him 5th game him a ton of coin and expect him to tear it up. He did a nice job but not spectacular. ";}}i:1;s:1089:" The Bates scheme is set up for the MLB to make plays: In Bates' last five seasons as the Dolphins' coordinator, middle linebacker Zach Thomas never failed to finish among the top five in tackles, topping the NFL in 2002. Green Bay middle linebacker Nick Barnett ranked sixth with a career-high 139 tackles during his lone season with Bates in 2005. "The mike linebacker in our scheme has to have a lot of mobility and speed, because we put a lot pressure on them," Bates said. According to the Packers own stats, Barnett broke a 24-year-old Packers record with 194 tackles under Bates. The MLB is much more of the playmaking position in Bates' style defense, which is what we are still running. You basically play two NT's to disrupt the interior blocking which allows the MLB to run more freely than he normally might. Every single team where Bates has been the DC, the MLB has been the main playmaker. Watch what happens in Denver this year. It is a huge credit to Hawk that he made so many tackles at WLB. I'd like to see what he could do as the MLB to be honest.";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000648
  21. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149244, a:1:{i:0;s:599:"Yes... and who was the Defensive Coordinator in Hawk's rookie season? It wasn't Bates. Bob Sanders said he was going to "tweak" Bates system. I guess you're now saying Barnett is a worse player because of AJ's arrival? That's what we were going for when we added Hawk? I wish Hawk would go to middle as well. Barnett would make more plays a t the Will. Imo. Before Hawk's arrival there was always talk of moving Barnett to Will to take advantage of his athleticism and speed. Why would we think of doing that? We don't have to do it now because Hawk and Barnett are comparable.";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000648
  22. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149245, a:1:{i:0;s:89:"sounds like oannes is a pee wee football coach too. dont choke on those crazy pills.";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000639
  23. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149246, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:3:{i:0;s:152:"Yes... and who was the Defensive Coordinator in Hawk's rookie season? It wasn't Bates. Bob Sanders said he was going to "tweak" Bates system. ";i:1;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:1:"b";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:3:"[b]";i:1;s:4:"[/b]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:128:"I guess you're now saying Barnett is a worse player because of AJ's arrival? That's what we were going for when we added Hawk?";}}i:2;s:319:" I wish Hawk would go to middle as well. Barnett would make more plays a t the Will. Imo. Before Hawk's arrival there was always talk of moving Barnett to Will to take advantage of his athleticism and speed. Why would we think of doing that? We don't have to do it now because Hawk and Barnett are comparable.";}}i:1;s:39:" What the hell makes you think that?";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000567
  24. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149247, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:6:"Oannes";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:16:"[quote="Oannes"]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:3:{i:0;s:152:"Yes... and who was the Defensive Coordinator in Hawk's rookie season? It wasn't Bates. Bob Sanders said he was going to "tweak" Bates system. ";i:1;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:1:"b";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:3:"[b]";i:1;s:4:"[/b]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:128:"I guess you're now saying Barnett is a worse player because of AJ's arrival? That's what we were going for when we added Hawk?";}}i:2;s:319:" I wish Hawk would go to middle as well. Barnett would make more plays a t the Will. Imo. Before Hawk's arrival there was always talk of moving Barnett to Will to take advantage of his athleticism and speed. Why would we think of doing that? We don't have to do it now because Hawk and Barnett are comparable.";}}i:1;s:39:" What the hell makes you think that?";}}i:1;s:23:" its the crazy pills";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000648
  25. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149248, a:1:{i:0;s:766:"Please, for some balance post the role of the weakside backer in Bates scheme. Crazy pills? Pee wee football? One post that appears to have "gotten" me and it's time to pile on. Just post the role of the weakside guy in Bates/Sander system. Then, all who have piled on will get off and go back to watching. Hawk is the playmaker on this defense... not Barnett. As I said, Barnett was always on the verge of being moved to weakside to take advantage of his skill set. He never moved because we had no one else to take over the middle. Hawk has a strong skill set and was put on the weak side to make plays. He made more than Barnett. Barnett should've gotten better with a stronger Weakside linebacker next to him but his numbers went down. Why?";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000735
  26. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149249, a:1:{i:0;s:346:"Theoretically, I'd say if the whole defense improves, the leading tackler will drop in numbers, both because of less plays on the field (as someone already pointed out) and because, as the skills of each player increase, you would expect a more balanced distribution of tackles across the team. This is if you don't change the system of defense.";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000716
  27. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149250, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:766:"Please, for some balance post the role of the weakside backer in Bates scheme. Crazy pills? Pee wee football? One post that appears to have "gotten" me and it's time to pile on. Just post the role of the weakside guy in Bates/Sander system. Then, all who have piled on will get off and go back to watching. Hawk is the playmaker on this defense... not Barnett. As I said, Barnett was always on the verge of being moved to weakside to take advantage of his skill set. He never moved because we had no one else to take over the middle. Hawk has a strong skill set and was put on the weak side to make plays. He made more than Barnett. Barnett should've gotten better with a stronger Weakside linebacker next to him but his numbers went down. Why?";}}i:1;s:299:" This is where you are arrogant. You ask others for balance, but offer none in your posts. Why don't you try and justify some of your arguments as well? Btw, when did Sanders say he was going to "tweak" anything? And how does that now mean(conjured from thin air) that now the WLB is the focus?";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000654
  28. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149251, a:4:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:672:"Tommy Maddox was HORRIBLE... He wouldn't be good with any team. How'd the Cutler for Plummer move work out for Denver? Not good. The odds favor Brady Quinn and the poor Cleveland team struggling mightily in 2008. I have a strong opinion on what is going to happen. What is yours? Or is it just more fun to mock someone who stands up and takes a strong stand. Go on record. Let's hear what you think of Clevelands Win/Loss prospects in '08. What is your problem with me. Nobody else seems to have the issues you do. Is it because I don't have any Packer helmets yellowed next to my moniker and am just a Waterboy and you're a 2nd round pick?";}}i:1;s:525:" Gee where to start with this ... Well, first I don't much give a rats booty about the Browns, this is a Packers site, hence the green dominance. Oh what the hell, I'll say the Browns go 6 - 10 (thats jus a open guess without looking at their roster or schedule, it jus sounds Brown'ish to me.) I don't have much of a problem with you. You remind me how much I've learned in the NFL over the years and how far you have to go. (whoa that wreaked of arrogance) 2nd round pick? HALL OF FAMER baby! :) heh ";i:2;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:272:"I'm glad we have Hawk, but I'd prefer Urlacher. If both guys were the same age I'm sure all 32 teams would rather have Urlacher. I don't want to continue arguing. I'll let it go with your comparable argument without getting too specific as to what you might mean.";}}i:3;s:172:" So lets get this straight. You are comparing a guy coming into his second year with a guy who's entering his seventh? I guess that's getting to specific for ya huh?";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000705
  29. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149252, a:1:{i:0;s:384:"Hawk and Barnett are one of the best young duos at LB in the league. When you look at their age, production and potential, GB should feel very fortunate. Now, will they end up being on the level that Urlacher+Briggs or Quarles+Brooks or Lewis+Hartwell were in their prime? Who knows, but I like what I see so far and think this tandem will be a great strength on the team for a while.";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000815
  30. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149253, a:1:{i:0;s:2665:"Your Hall of Famer-ness.... I compared Hawk to Urlacher in their ROOKIE years. Cripes. How many times do I need to say that? I've given plenty of stuff to this argument. I've gotten called names. I've had people call me names and use "facts" that weren't facts at all to defend their wrong stances ala Briggs and Urlacher. The Weakside LB is the PLAYMAKING position. I don't care if the middle backer makes 200 tackles. Weakside is where the playmaker is lined up in our scheme. As I said, who knows how many times, that the debate raged between fans and coaching staff alike about whether to move Barnett to weakside. Why would that be? It was to take more advantage of his skills. He's light in the shorts and would be able to make more plays if he wasn't dealing with olineman running at him. Hawk is freer at Weak to make plays. I'm not disparaging Hawk because of his position. Maybe, they'll decide to move Barnett to Weak and put Hawk in the middle.... I'm not the fortune teller I've been accused of being. A person comes here and posts Bates thoughts on the middle backer position and you all assume the role of the weakside guy is somehow less? Again, I ask why the thought of moving Barnett to weak all those years? SO HE COULD MAKE MORE PLAYS. Man. Just because Zach Thomas led the Dolphins all those years means what? Who did the Dolphins have playing weakside? Anyone? Hawk and Barnett are a nice duo. Both are extremely important. Would it make you feel better if I found a story talking about Sanders tweaking Bates scheme? Here ya go... Packers | Sanders will use same 4-3 defense Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:39:52 -0800 Jeff Fedotin, of Packers.com, reports Green Bay Packers defensive coordinator Bob Sanders will use a similar 4-3 defense, but will tweak former defensive coordinator Jim Bates' scheme. Sanders did not elaborate but said they could include some different coverages. Here's more from Nick Barnett himself from a Tom Oates article... And, as Barnett admitted Tuesday, the Packers aren't going to move the high-profile Hawk to the lowest-profile linebacker position. "They need A.J. at will. When you draft somebody that high, you want to put him at the mike or the will so they'll have productive numbers," Barnett said. "And I understand the reasoning of wanting to move me to the sam, because I can cover and I'm a smart player, but I think Abdul's smart enough to play that position, too. ---They always talked of Barnett to the Will and then Hawk comes and they're talking Hodge at Mike...Hawk at Will and Barnett at Sam. Why? Hawk is expected to be the playmaker.";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000743
  31. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149254, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:89:"sounds like oannes is a pee wee football coach too. dont choke on those crazy pills.";}}i:1;s:58:" Does this shit ever stop. It must really bother you.";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000640
  32. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149255, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:2665:"Your Hall of Famer-ness.... I compared Hawk to Urlacher in their ROOKIE years. Cripes. How many times do I need to say that? I've given plenty of stuff to this argument. I've gotten called names. I've had people call me names and use "facts" that weren't facts at all to defend their wrong stances ala Briggs and Urlacher. The Weakside LB is the PLAYMAKING position. I don't care if the middle backer makes 200 tackles. Weakside is where the playmaker is lined up in our scheme. As I said, who knows how many times, that the debate raged between fans and coaching staff alike about whether to move Barnett to weakside. Why would that be? It was to take more advantage of his skills. He's light in the shorts and would be able to make more plays if he wasn't dealing with olineman running at him. Hawk is freer at Weak to make plays. I'm not disparaging Hawk because of his position. Maybe, they'll decide to move Barnett to Weak and put Hawk in the middle.... I'm not the fortune teller I've been accused of being. A person comes here and posts Bates thoughts on the middle backer position and you all assume the role of the weakside guy is somehow less? Again, I ask why the thought of moving Barnett to weak all those years? SO HE COULD MAKE MORE PLAYS. Man. Just because Zach Thomas led the Dolphins all those years means what? Who did the Dolphins have playing weakside? Anyone? Hawk and Barnett are a nice duo. Both are extremely important. Would it make you feel better if I found a story talking about Sanders tweaking Bates scheme? Here ya go... Packers | Sanders will use same 4-3 defense Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:39:52 -0800 Jeff Fedotin, of Packers.com, reports Green Bay Packers defensive coordinator Bob Sanders will use a similar 4-3 defense, but will tweak former defensive coordinator Jim Bates' scheme. Sanders did not elaborate but said they could include some different coverages. Here's more from Nick Barnett himself from a Tom Oates article... And, as Barnett admitted Tuesday, the Packers aren't going to move the high-profile Hawk to the lowest-profile linebacker position. "They need A.J. at will. When you draft somebody that high, you want to put him at the mike or the will so they'll have productive numbers," Barnett said. "And I understand the reasoning of wanting to move me to the sam, because I can cover and I'm a smart player, but I think Abdul's smart enough to play that position, too. ---They always talked of Barnett to the Will and then Hawk comes and they're talking Hodge at Mike...Hawk at Will and Barnett at Sam. Why? Hawk is expected to be the playmaker.";}}i:1;s:344:" Oannes what you say is correct. People read what he is saying! He is no way knocking Hawk. They won't ever get it. You must understand that these people are on the defense at any mention of this teams flaws. Poor guy is trying to have a debate and create conversation and you guys can't do anything but instantly defend. Sad, real sad";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000705
  33. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149256, a:1:{i:0;s:69:"can't compare them, they are at two different levels of their career.";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000660
  34. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149257, a:12:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:126:"Your Hall of Famer-ness.... I compared Hawk to Urlacher in their ROOKIE years. Cripes. How many times do I need to say that?";}}i:1;s:142:" Their rookie years are comparable as many have mentioned. You turned it into people saying Hawk was "more impactful" than Urlacher. ";i:2;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:199:"I've given plenty of stuff to this argument. I've gotten called names. I've had people call me names and use "facts" that weren't facts at all to defend their wrong stances ala Briggs and Urlacher.";}}i:3;s:55:" What "facts" have you given to this argument? ";i:4;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:702:"The Weakside LB is the PLAYMAKING position. I don't care if the middle backer makes 200 tackles. Weakside is where the playmaker is lined up in our scheme. As I said, who knows how many times, that the debate raged between fans and coaching staff alike about whether to move Barnett to weakside. Why would that be? It was to take more advantage of his skills. He's light in the shorts and would be able to make more plays if he wasn't dealing with olineman running at him. Hawk is freer at Weak to make plays. I'm not disparaging Hawk because of his position. Maybe, they'll decide to move Barnett to Weak and put Hawk in the middle.... I'm not the fortune teller I've been accused of being.";}}i:5;s:619:" The conversation firs started about production. No one has said the WLB isn't the guy that makes the plays, but it's a fact that the MLB is more productive. The whole statement was that Hawk from the WLB position leading the team in tackles in his first year no less was a great accomplishment. Since we are in the discussion of the two positions WLB and MLB why are you comparing Urlacher and Hawk as far as "impact" anyways? Are they not different roles? Btw, the "freeness" of a linebacker depends on the linemen in front of them. Hawk having KGB in front of vs the run certainly doesn't help Hawk any. ";i:6;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:374:"A person comes here and posts Bates thoughts on the middle backer position and you all assume the role of the weakside guy is somehow less? Again, I ask why the thought of moving Barnett to weak all those years? SO HE COULD MAKE MORE PLAYS. Man. Just because Zach Thomas led the Dolphins all those years means what? Who did the Dolphins have playing weakside? Anyone?";}}i:7;s:389:" The debate was for Barnetts skillset yes, but not "for him to make more plays" it was because many thought he was too small for the MLB position. The Phins have had a relvolving door at WLB. Had they had a guy like Hawk then Thomas' numbers would go down not because Thomas would be "worse" or "not as good" with Hawk there, but because they would have added an excellent player. ";i:8;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:548:"Packers | Sanders will use same 4-3 defense Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:39:52 -0800 Jeff Fedotin, of Packers.com, reports Green Bay Packers defensive coordinator Bob Sanders will use a similar 4-3 defense, but will tweak former defensive coordinator Jim Bates' scheme. Sanders did not elaborate but said they could include some different coverages. Here's more from Nick Barnett himself from a Tom Oates article... And, as Barnett admitted Tuesday, the Packers aren't going to move the high-profile Hawk to the lowest-profile linebacker position.";}}i:9;s:217:" He "tweaked" the coverages a little bit. I'll ask again as I did in a previous post what does that have to do with the major role for the WLB in Bates system? Btw, MLB is HARDLY the low profile Lber position. ";i:10;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:512:""They need A.J. at will. When you draft somebody that high, you want to put him at the mike or the will so they'll have productive numbers," Barnett said. "And I understand the reasoning of wanting to move me to the sam, because I can cover and I'm a smart player, but I think Abdul's smart enough to play that position, too. ---They always talked of Barnett to the Will and then Hawk comes and they're talking Hodge at Mike...Hawk at Will and Barnett at Sam. Why? Hawk is expected to be the playmaker.";}}i:11;s:274:" Of course they expect AJ to be productive as Barnett said and he was very productive in his rookie year. I don't see how Barnett's quote concedes with whatever argument you're trying to make. Of course Hawk is expected to be a playmaker. Who is arguing that he isn't?";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000701
  35. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149258, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:126:"Your Hall of Famer-ness.... I compared Hawk to Urlacher in their ROOKIE years. Cripes. How many times do I need to say that?";}}i:1;s:726:" I confess, it's the first I've read of it. (doesnt mean you didnt say it though, i dont have time to read every single post) I still think its unjustified to say you'd take someone entering their second year vs someone entering their seventh. You've seen production year in year out for one and haven't seen anything but one year. If they'd both came out at the same time and you were saying that, I'd put more stock into it for ya. If you're just saying you'd rather have Urlacher over Hawk straight out of college. I think your nuts. In five years, I might say you were dead on. I don't know how Hawk is going to pan out. I hope Hawk can be as solid as Urlacher for twice the duration Urlacher has thus far.";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000740
  36. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149259, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:6:"Oannes";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:16:"[quote="Oannes"]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:2665:"Your Hall of Famer-ness.... I compared Hawk to Urlacher in their ROOKIE years. Cripes. How many times do I need to say that? I've given plenty of stuff to this argument. I've gotten called names. I've had people call me names and use "facts" that weren't facts at all to defend their wrong stances ala Briggs and Urlacher. The Weakside LB is the PLAYMAKING position. I don't care if the middle backer makes 200 tackles. Weakside is where the playmaker is lined up in our scheme. As I said, who knows how many times, that the debate raged between fans and coaching staff alike about whether to move Barnett to weakside. Why would that be? It was to take more advantage of his skills. He's light in the shorts and would be able to make more plays if he wasn't dealing with olineman running at him. Hawk is freer at Weak to make plays. I'm not disparaging Hawk because of his position. Maybe, they'll decide to move Barnett to Weak and put Hawk in the middle.... I'm not the fortune teller I've been accused of being. A person comes here and posts Bates thoughts on the middle backer position and you all assume the role of the weakside guy is somehow less? Again, I ask why the thought of moving Barnett to weak all those years? SO HE COULD MAKE MORE PLAYS. Man. Just because Zach Thomas led the Dolphins all those years means what? Who did the Dolphins have playing weakside? Anyone? Hawk and Barnett are a nice duo. Both are extremely important. Would it make you feel better if I found a story talking about Sanders tweaking Bates scheme? Here ya go... Packers | Sanders will use same 4-3 defense Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:39:52 -0800 Jeff Fedotin, of Packers.com, reports Green Bay Packers defensive coordinator Bob Sanders will use a similar 4-3 defense, but will tweak former defensive coordinator Jim Bates' scheme. Sanders did not elaborate but said they could include some different coverages. Here's more from Nick Barnett himself from a Tom Oates article... And, as Barnett admitted Tuesday, the Packers aren't going to move the high-profile Hawk to the lowest-profile linebacker position. "They need A.J. at will. When you draft somebody that high, you want to put him at the mike or the will so they'll have productive numbers," Barnett said. "And I understand the reasoning of wanting to move me to the sam, because I can cover and I'm a smart player, but I think Abdul's smart enough to play that position, too. ---They always talked of Barnett to the Will and then Hawk comes and they're talking Hodge at Mike...Hawk at Will and Barnett at Sam. Why? Hawk is expected to be the playmaker.";}}i:1;s:344:" Oannes what you say is correct. People read what he is saying! He is no way knocking Hawk. They won't ever get it. You must understand that these people are on the defense at any mention of this teams flaws. Poor guy is trying to have a debate and create conversation and you guys can't do anything but instantly defend. Sad, real sad";}}i:1;s:902:" Uh.....to "debate" you have to be allowed to give your side of the disscussion. If you do so though, you are labeled as "defending"? But when you or Oannes do it, it's NOT defending? He compares Hawk with Urlacher's first year. They are on DIFFERENT teams, with DIFFERENT other players on their teams. Maybe if Hawk would have been with the Chicago players at that time, maybe he would have been as good as Urlacher. Or had he been with the Packer team of last year, maybe he wouldn't have done as good as Hawk.Yes, they both play linebacker, but their situations make them very different. You can only compare numbers. Hawk was pretty good in my view. Thats all i'm saying. Urlacher was pretty good his rookie year too. No question about that. But I'm "defending" while Oannes and you are what? He agrees with you, so he is somehow not doing the same thing you accuse us of? How hypocritical.";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000923
  37. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149260, a:1:{i:0;s:504:"lol@Hall of Famer-ness i like that :P If you're not discrediting Hawk and just saying that Hawk is good, but you'd rather Urlacher. Okay. I can accept that. I just can't say I'd rather one over the other when one is starting his career an the other is towards the middle. Both are fine players though for sure. Now, if you want to say you'd rather Urlacher over Barnett, I'd be more in tune with that because its two players at the SAME position and you've seen both play for a few years.";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000750
  38. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149261, a:4:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:3:{i:0;s:98:" And, as Barnett admitted Tuesday, the Packers aren't going to move the high-profile Hawk to the ";i:1;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:1:"b";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:3:"[b]";i:1;s:4:"[/b]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:34:"lowest-profile linebacker position";}}i:2;s:1:".";}}i:1;s:85:" Just for reference, they were talking about the SAM here, not the mike or will. ";i:2;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:512:""They need A.J. at will. When you draft somebody that high, you want to put him at the mike or the will so they'll have productive numbers," Barnett said. "And I understand the reasoning of wanting to move me to the sam, because I can cover and I'm a smart player, but I think Abdul's smart enough to play that position, too. ---They always talked of Barnett to the Will and then Hawk comes and they're talking Hodge at Mike...Hawk at Will and Barnett at Sam. Why? Hawk is expected to be the playmaker.";}}i:3;s:733:" Again, they are saying the wil is in a position to make more plays than the sam - I don't see anyone arguing that. The sam is responsible for covering the TE and getting through more blockers than the will. It's a simple concept - since the sam plays on the "strong side", he needs to fight through the TE to make tackles on runs. The Wil does not have to fight through tackles, but he often has to cover more ground as most teams tend to run to the strong side. The Mike has the best of all worlds in that they can make a play on either side and rarely face outside blockers like TEs. So, to summarize, from a playmaking standpoint: Mike > Will Will > Sam And I think everyone but you has already agreed to this concept.";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000790
  39. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149262, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:730:"Urlacher's numbers are down since Briggs became the player he did? Right now, Lance Briggs is as good as he's ever been... I mean this past season. Lance Briggs did NOT hurt Urlacher's numbers, in fact, Urlacher had 141 tackles last season...the SECOND most in his 7 year career. Briggs, meanwhile, had the most tackles of his career last season. So, Urlacher's tackles did NOT go down because of Briggs emergence. Go compare all the seasons. You will find it's inaccurate to say Briggs hurt Urlacher's numbers. But... AJ Hawk's arrival certainly hurt Barnett's numbers. My Jennings vs. Boldin was for effect. What is asinine is continually arguing a point that was lost before it was argued in the first place.";}}i:1;s:1436:" The reason any point in your posts are lost is because they are pointless in the first place. Urlacher vs. Hawk's rookie year? WG'SAF. It's pointless. We picked Hawk at #5. He was a top five on EVERYBODYS board, we need LB"S badly, he had a great first year, and, will be great for years to come. End of Story. Jenning's vs. Boldin? Would you please just quit making comparisons of different players on different teams asked to do different things. Justin Harrell was a great pick for OUR SCHEME because he will occupy offensive lineman and allow the LB's to finish. Now Justin Harrell may end up doing a FANTASTIC JOB at this and our defense may benefit greatly from his play but watch. Some asshole will compare the number of tackles he had to Billy Bob Brown who was picked in the 4th round by some team. Of course this means NOTHING. It is totally irrelevant to anything. What in the hell sense does it make to compare a great player who had great numbers to another player who had good numbers as well. I am quite certain several CB's had more interceptions and more tackles than Al Harris and I am also quite certain that several of those CB's couldn't carry Al Harris' shoes to the lockeroom let alone play at his level. Can you find a topic other than irrelevant comparisons to discuss or would you like to be known around here as MR. IRRELEVANT? Because that's where your nonsense is going to get you.";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000792
  40. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 149263, a:3:{i:0;s:50:"Wow, warhawk, way to lay the smacketh downeth. ";i:1;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:7:"[quote]";i:1;s:8:"[/quote]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:161:"It's pointless. We picked Hawk at #5. He was a top five on EVERYBODYS board, we need LB"S badly, he had a great first year, and, will be great for years to come.";}}i:2;s:187:" I'd like to add that there were rumors days before the draft that the Saints were going to draft AJ Hawk at #2 if the Texans took Reggie Bush. Thank peaches the Texans signed Mario lol";}, 1466975802, 1469807971
    Run Time: 0.000632

Included Files (154, XenForo Classes: 63)

  1. index.php
  2. library/XenForo/Autoloader.php
  3. library/XenForo/Application.php
  4. library/Zend/Registry.php
  5. library/Lgpl/utf8.php
  6. library/Zend/Config.php
  7. library/config.php
  8. library/XenForo/FrontController.php
  9. library/XenForo/Dependencies/Public.php
  10. library/XenForo/Dependencies/Abstract.php
  11. library/Zend/Controller/Request/Http.php
  12. library/Zend/Controller/Request/Abstract.php
  13. library/Zend/Uri.php
  14. library/Zend/Controller/Response/Http.php
  15. library/Zend/Controller/Response/Abstract.php
  16. library/XenForo/Model/DataRegistry.php
  17. library/XenForo/Model.php
  18. library/Zend/Cache.php
  19. library/Zend/Cache/Backend/Memcached.php
  20. library/Zend/Cache/Backend/ExtendedInterface.php
  21. library/Zend/Cache/Backend/Interface.php
  22. library/Zend/Cache/Backend.php
  23. library/Zend/Cache/Core.php
  24. library/XenForo/CodeEvent.php
  25. library/XenForo/Options.php
  26. library/XenForo/Link.php
  27. library/XenForo/Template/Helper/Core.php
  28. library/FreePro/Listener.php
  29. library/bdTagMe/Listener.php
  30. library/bdTagMe/Helper/Template.php
  31. library/bdTagMe/ShippableHelper/Updater.php
  32. library/bdTagMe/Option.php
  33. library/sonnb/XenGallery/Listener.php
  34. library/EWRporta2/Listener/Init.php
  35. library/XenForo/Router.php
  36. library/XenForo/Route/Filter.php
  37. library/XenForo/Route/Interface.php
  38. library/XenForo/Route/ResponseSuffix.php
  39. library/XenForo/Route/Prefix.php
  40. library/XenForo/Route/Prefix/Threads.php
  41. library/XenForo/RouteMatch.php
  42. library/XenForo/ControllerPublic/Thread.php
  43. library/XenForo/ControllerPublic/Abstract.php
  44. library/XenForo/Controller.php
  45. library/ModerateCountry/RegisterListener.php
  46. library/EWRporta2/Widget/Listener/ArticlesMain.php
  47. library/Nobita/IgnoreThread/Listener.php
  48. library/Dark/PostRating/EventListener.php
  49. library/EWRporta2/Listener/Controller.php
  50. library/FreePro/XenForo/ControllerPublic/Thread.php
  51. library/Nobita/IgnoreThread/ControllerPublic/Thread.php
  52. library/sonnb/XenGallery/XenForo/ControllerPublic/Thread.php
  53. library/EWRporta2/ControllerPublic/Thread.php
  54. library/XenForo/Input.php
  55. library/XenForo/Session.php
  56. library/Zend/Db.php
  57. library/Zend/Db/Adapter/Mysqli.php
  58. library/Zend/Db/Adapter/Abstract.php
  59. library/Zend/Db/Select.php
  60. library/Zend/Db/Expr.php
  61. library/Zend/Db/Profiler.php
  62. library/Zend/Db/Statement/Mysqli.php
  63. library/Zend/Db/Statement.php
  64. library/Zend/Db/Statement/Interface.php
  65. library/XenForo/Helper/Ip.php
  66. library/XenForo/Visitor.php
  67. library/XenForo/Model/User.php
  68. library/ThemeHouse/JoinUserGroup/Listener/LoadClass.php
  69. library/ThemeHouse/Listener/LoadClass.php
  70. library/ThemeHouse/Listener/LoadClass/20150518.php
  71. library/Dark/TaigaChat/EventListener/Listener.php
  72. library/sonnbThreadMassActions/Listener.php
  73. library/EWRporta2/Listener/Model.php
  74. library/ThemeHouse/JoinUserGroup/Extend/XenForo/Model/User.php
  75. library/Dark/PostRating/Model/User.php
  76. library/bdTagMe/XenForo/Model/User.php
  77. library/sonnb/XenGallery/XenForo/Model/User.php
  78. library/EWRporta2/Model/User.php
  79. library/Zend/Db/Profiler/Query.php
  80. library/XenForo/Permission.php
  81. library/XenForo/Helper/Php.php
  82. library/XenForo/Phrase.php
  83. library/XenForo/Locale.php
  84. library/Sedo/DetectBrowser/Listener/Visitor.php
  85. library/Sedo/DetectBrowser/Helper/MobileDetect.php
  86. library/EWRporta2/Model/Perms.php
  87. library/ThemeHouse/JoinUserGroup/Listener/ControllerPreDispatch.php
  88. library/ThemeHouse/Listener/ControllerPreDispatch.php
  89. library/ThemeHouse/Listener/ControllerPreDispatch/20150911.php
  90. library/UnreadPostCount/Listener.php
  91. library/XenForo/ControllerHelper/ForumThreadPost.php
  92. library/XenForo/ControllerHelper/Abstract.php
  93. library/XenForo/Model/Thread.php
  94. library/Nobita/IgnoreThread/Model/Thread.php
  95. library/Dark/PostRating/Model/Thread.php
  96. library/sonnbThreadMassActions/Model/Thread.php
  97. library/UnreadPostCount/Model/Thread.php
  98. library/Dark/PostRating/Model.php
  99. library/XenForo/Model/Forum.php
  100. library/XenForo/Helper/String.php
  101. library/XenForo/Helper/Discussion.php
  102. library/XenForo/Model/Post.php
  103. library/Dark/PostRating/Model/Post.php
  104. library/sonnbThreadMassActions/Model/Post.php
  105. library/EWRporta2/Model/Post.php
  106. library/EWRporta2/Model/Articles.php
  107. library/XenForo/Model/Attachment.php
  108. library/XenForo/Model/Node.php
  109. library/Nobita/IgnoreThread/Model/Node.php
  110. library/XenForo/Route/Prefix/Categories.php
  111. library/XenForo/Route/Prefix/Forums.php
  112. library/XenForo/ControllerResponse/View.php
  113. library/XenForo/ControllerResponse/Abstract.php
  114. library/Nobita/IgnoreThread/Model/IgnoreThread.php
  115. library/XenForo/Helper/Cookie.php
  116. library/XenForo/ViewRenderer/HtmlPublic.php
  117. library/XenForo/ViewRenderer/Abstract.php
  118. library/XenForo/Template/Public.php
  119. library/XenForo/Template/Abstract.php
  120. library/XenForo/ViewPublic/Thread/View.php
  121. library/XenForo/ViewPublic/Base.php
  122. library/XenForo/View.php
  123. library/EWRporta2/Listener/ViewPublic.php
  124. library/XenForo/BbCode/Parser.php
  125. library/XenForo/BbCode/Formatter/Base.php
  126. library/EWRporta2/Listener/BbCode.php
  127. library/bdTagMe/XenForo/BbCode/Formatter/Base.php
  128. library/sonnb/XenGallery/XenForo/BbCode/Formatter/Base.php
  129. library/EWRporta2/BbCode/Formatter.php
  130. library/XenForo/ViewPublic/Helper/Message.php
  131. library/XenForo/BbCode/TextWrapper.php
  132. library/WhoHasVisited/Listener.php
  133. library/XenForo/Route/Prefix/Members.php
  134. library/bdTagMe/XenForo/Route/Prefix/Members.php
  135. library/Dark/TaigaChat/EventListener/NavigationTabs.php
  136. library/EWRporta2/Listener/NavTabs.php
  137. library/XenForo/Template/FileHandler.php
  138. library/XenForo/Helper/File.php
  139. internal_data/templates/S.7,L.1,thread_view.php
  140. library/SeparateStickyAndNormal/Listener.php
  141. library/EWRporta2/Listener/Template.php
  142. internal_data/templates/S.7,L.1,ignore_thread_tool.php
  143. internal_data/templates/S.7,L.1,page_nav.php
  144. library/XenForo/Route/Prefix/Posts.php
  145. library/XenForo/Model/Avatar.php
  146. internal_data/templates/S.7,L.1,dark_postrating_message_user_info.php
  147. internal_data/templates/S.7,L.1,bb_code_tag_quote.php
  148. internal_data/templates/S.7,L.1,dark_postrating.php
  149. library/XenForo/Helper/Criteria.php
  150. library/XenForo/Debug.php
  151. internal_data/templates/S.7,L.1,PAGE_CONTAINER.php
  152. library/FreePro/Helper.php
  153. internal_data/templates/S.7,L.1,EWRporta2_Navtabs.php
  154. library/XenForo/ViewRenderer/Json.php