Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="pyledriver80" data-source="post: 89336" data-attributes="member: 194">I'm sorry for actually reading what you say, my bad I guess. When I read the following"Yes, if our current talent had an "equal amount of experience", which they do not, they would be superior to the team two years ago"It seems pretty Black and White to me. So I guess we are reverting to somthing different than what you originally said. Now you are saying the STARTERS have less experience. There you will find the problem with this team and my problem with one Ted Thompson. Instead of using veteran guys so we can go 10-6 again while STILL developing the young guys, he has chosen to go with a 4-12 roster while ruining the confidence of guys like Colledge and putting Brett in danger of being decapitated. On top of this he appoints a rookie head coach to lead these young men.So to be clear, we have more Talent, Depth, and Experience but we will be worse than the 2004 team who had less? Sounds crazy to me, sorry.The truth is we do not have more talent - If we did we would be better, period. You are tossing around the word TALENT a little to freely. Every player in the NFL has talent. Some reach the full potential of thier talent, some do not. Until they do, thier TALENT means very little. We do not have more Depth as a team. If we did we would not be forced to start rookies and then, by your own admission, go 10-6.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,546 (members: 0, guests: 1,546)