Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sunshinepacker" data-source="post: 794900" data-attributes="member: 9033">The Bears were good without him, they're great with him. It's not revisionist to point out that Perry is constantly injured and only played through those injuries in a contract year, that's what happened. And NO defensive player makes a defense good or bad on their own, their is no defensive equivalent of a QB. However, having a top-5 defensive player goes a long way towards making a good defense.And where do you see that Perry and Matthews are similar?! In Clay's first 6 years he had 61 sacks; Perry has 30.5 sacks in his first six years! So if you meant literally half by "about like" then I agree....</blockquote>

Total: 1,042 (members: 1, guests: 1,041)