Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 794870" data-attributes="member: 12283">I can only speak for myself, but you don't hear me saying that it would be a terrible idea to resign Clinton-Dix. I'm not 100% sold they do it, but he has been way, way better on the field than fans want to give him credit for.Perry didn't only show up in a contract year. He just managed to start 12 games, which was way more than what he had previously. On a per snap basis, he wasn't all that different than he had been previously. His problem has always been durability, rather than actual ability. Now someone could argue that you shouldn't sign a guy who is that injury prone, and I think there's some validity to that argument. But you have to suggest a viable alternative. And to me to, it's not a viable alternative to bring up the possibility of trading for Mack when that possibility didn't come up for over a year after Perry signed his extension. At the time that the Packers kept Perry, the other options were fairly paltry.</blockquote>

Total: 307 (members: 1, guests: 306)