Rodgers2Finley4TDs
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2010
- Messages
- 183
- Reaction score
- 16
You're humor is incredible....... ON April 1stYou will be missed---- ON April 1
You're humor is incredible....... ON April 1stYou will be missed---- ON April 1
You're humor is incredible....... ON April 1st
you're*Your still here?
Newhouse is the worst player on our line last season according to Pro football focus...... http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2012/02/23/ranking-the-2011-offensive-lines-part-2/
A third of the way down the page number 11 ranked line.
Don't sound so confident when I'm sure you don't study the left tackle position. I'm sure you'r one of the fans that just watches the ball. (can't blame you since we have rodgers) but you are wrong about newhouse being the answer
LOL! That was grant's only fumble of the season, but nice try.
1. Lynch is a pro bowler and Jackson is a scub. That is incorrect and blasphemousAt the time he was actually worse than Brandon Jackson, save for one pretty impressive and miraculous run. And we certainly wouldn't have kept him at the 4 year, $31 Million with $18 Million guaranteed deal he inked with the Seahawks, so really, all this is much ado about nothing..
1. Lynch is a pro bowler and Jackson is a scub. That is incorrect and blasphemous
2. You don't know that we wouldn't have resigned him. The Seahawks resigned him and and we're still free agent signing this off season including getting a new QB.
Wrong on both points. Try again?
You don't know that we don't resign him. Stop talking in absolutes about that. MArshawn Lynch would have been a good player in 2010 (had the best run in playoff history), 2011, and looks to be good in 2012 and beyond. So that makes no sense.Yup, I know absolutely nothing about football. Absolutely nothing.
The idea that we're somehow not addressing our weaknesses is asinine, just like every post you've made on the subject. The problem you have is realizing you don't always make moves because they benefit you today. You have to balance with improving your team today AND tomorrow. If you do it right, the players you select today will be the players who keep your team competitive tomorrow. We're in a position where we don't need Cobb to be a standout yet, which gives him time to grow and improve even more.
And seriously, what's the point in throwing away a high round draft pick for a guy we weren't going to extend at the money he wanted anyway? We weren't going to pay him $18 Million guaranteed over 4 years, so he would have, in essence, been a half year rental at the cost of a second round draft pick.
But no, I know nothing about football.
1. Jackson was never better than Lynch. IDC if he broke off a long run in the redkins game. Hes awful. Its not a fact at all. Quit making stuff up. Anyone who believes that is a fool.BAHAHAHAHA! Reading comprehension obviously isn't your strong suit, is it? Go back and re-read what I wrote. I said, "At the time.." It's fact that Brandon Jackson was better than Marshawn Lynch the year he was traded. Better for our offense too.
You're right, I don't know for fact we wouldn't have re-signed him, just like you don't know for sure we would have. So I guess you're just as wrong there. But using logic, and the fact we wouldn't extend Grant, is a pretty good sign we wouldn't extend Lynch for that kind of money. As for the free agent's we're signing this year, ever hear of the veteran minimum? We're getting a helluva deal on the guys we're bringing in through free agency, not dropping high dollar contracts. . But hey, thanks for playing!
Man. I hate seeing fans of my team act like your everyday Patriot or Giant fan. What a dumb thing to say. Yeah lets never acquire a good player again because we didn't need em to win it all in 2010.
We need a good RB. We could have got one for the cost of a second round pick that turned into our 5th WR. Lynch > Cobb. We should have traded for Lynch we would be a better team now. point blank periodShow me where I said we should never try to get a good player..Not sure how you made that leap.
We did win it all w/o him, so my point is accurate...Now 2 years later, people STILL we dont have him...
Yet I am told I said something dumb?
1. Lynch is a pro bowler and Jackson is a scub. That is incorrect and blasphemous
2. You don't know that we wouldn't have resigned him. The Seahawks resigned him and and we're still free agent signing this off season including getting a new QB.
Wrong on both points. Try again?
Lynch for the season he had 3.7 ypc a long of 39 yards and 6 td...Receiving 145 yards and no TD...
His tds came at 1st ,2nd and 3 and goal..And his one good game (3 tds) was vs the worse team in the league, Carolina..18 atts at goaline, 5 tds
Now go look at Jax, he only had 4 tds total but how many times at goal line did they give it to him? he only had 14 att at goaline and got 3 tds
So again tell me why Lynch IS BETTER after only one game when he had 16 other games to prove it?
There was about 12 game he played with Seattle?
Not one thread ( that I seen ) about him from anyone saying--- wow look at him, we should have got him...
Now after ONE and it was only one good run (GREAT RUN)
Now people come out of the wood work?? Because of ONE RUN??
If these same people were on Lynch's jock all season , okay then I get the told you so post..
He did JACK **** in Seattle all year----hell we could say since he was so **** poor, he may have COSTS us games we should have won
When I was going over his situational stats on yahoo, not only did he have more fumbles than Jackson, but on 3rd down runs? he was 1.2 average!!
RB Mark Ingram would be nice, let's face it Lynch and Forsett aren't getting the job done.
think about it, if you had a running back that is fast and can get the ball out on the flat and create his own plays, we would have alot more offensive play calling and can do a variety of things. we do not have this option with lynch and forsett.
this team has progressively gotten worse since the Lynch acquisition.
9 for 7 .08 yards per carry
7 for 20 2.9 per carry
13 for 29 2.2 yards per carry
Marshawn Lynch - Seattle Seahawks - Game Log - NFL - Yahoo! Sports
We need a good RB. We could have got one for the cost of a second round pick that turned into our 5th WR. Lynch > Cobb. We should have traded for Lynch we would be a better team now. point blank period
you're*
Your using hindsight...I didnt see one post from you mad we didnt get Lynch in the 1st few pages here...
Hell even fans of Seattle didnt want him, cuz he SUCKED....Then he had that one TERRIFIC run vs the Saints in the playoffs...That was all he did that entire season
Why did you make this and say just kidding?
http://www.packerforum.com/threads/...d-have-been-with-marshawn-lynch-though.26293/
Yes but what a run that was!!!! I think I jumped out of my chair and started doing back flips or jumping jacks or something (or a combo of both) when it happened.
Good stuff!!! lol Saints.
No need to guess who posted this, is there? I would much rather have Cobb than Lynch, particularly because of the nature of the Packers offense. And IMO the Packers RB situation is not a disaster. What will this poster post if Green fulfills his potential or Starks stays healthy all season, or Saine or Tyler emerge? I really don’t care but I do know this: It’s better to just admit you’re wrong. IMO it’s a sign of intelligence to change one's opinion when new facts emerge. And no matter how virulently anyone protests, the fact is the Packers won Super Bowl 45 and Marshawn Lynch wasn’t on the roster.I'm so happy we took Randall Cobb. This was a dream pick of mine coming into the draft. He can do it all. He played WR, RB, QB, and returner in college. He was good at everything and a menace in the open field. We are set with pass catchers for a long time. Ted Thompson is a genius.
I would much rather have Cobb and his future, which I think is pretty bright.