Thanks Amish....I forgot he told Peppers to go beat Green Bay
There isn't a Packer fan over the age of 10 who doesn't understand that Favre had a great career with the Packers. There isn't a fan who doesn't understand he had some 'character flaws' in cheating on his wife; texting pictures of his junk; or wearing crocs.
The problem with him that many of us have is that he no longer supports the Packers. He wants the Packers to lose. He wants other teams to beat the Packers. That is the problem. He wanted the Packers to lose so much he spent 2 years, traveled through New York, just so he could play for the Vikings so that he could stick it to the Pack. Sounds like a guy who hates the Packers. You want to support a guy who wants the Packers to lose? That's your choice man - he's no different right now than Jay Cutler, or any bear or viking.
To equate thatas(with) a simple character issue is shallow at best.
That goes for you too, right jaybadger82? After all that was your 11th post on this thread (mine too). If you think this is warped or perverse why open the thread and even if you do, why post on it?The real character issue I see around here is the obsession over Favre within the larger context of a children's game that is played for money. It strikes me as a bit warped (or "perverse" in its own way) that some can't let this go.
My point would be, if you choose to ridicule posters for their opinion, have the decency to either understand it of not to mischaracterize their view. Makes your last post a bit of 'compound' irony, at best.I'm not telling you that Favre's number should be retired. I'm telling you to get some perspective. We won a Superbowl without him. Move on.
That goes for you too, right jaybadger82? After all that was your 11th post on this thread (mine too). If you think this is warped or perverse why open the thread and even if you do, why post on it?
My point would be, if you choose to ridicule posters for their opinion, have the decency to either understand it of not to mischaracterize their view. Makes your last post a bit of 'compound' irony, at best.
Common ground! We're both very tired of the topic.Let's make it a dozen. Although few of my comments in this thread have actually discussed the topic of Brett Favre (hell, about half my posts involved a middle eastern policy debate with Amish), I have "stirred the fire" and your criticism is valid as such. So this will be my last one. Regardless, my original observation in post #95 remains: I think there are folks here that are too emotionally-invested in this Favre thing. Speaking of which...
Amish, I apologize if you felt ridiculed or if you felt your views were somehow mischaracterized. But I hope you can imagine how stale the lasting bitterness toward Favre has become amongst the less fervid, who might have a hard time understanding such lasting antagonism from a fan base that has watched its team go on to thrive without #4 and win a Superbowl. We're better than this.
I`m an English Packer fan. I know that I have no real right to comment but I`m going to anyway because I love this team in a way that EVEN I don`t quite understand. I`M reading stuff everyday which explains things more and more. Even as a Packer fan, I would have loved to see us sign Randy Moss, and yes, I remember the "Mooning" incident, which at the time I thought was fair as the abuse we were giving him, it was a human reaction, but that given, Brett Favre disrespected the organisation, the team, and most of all the loyal fans by his actions and comments through all of his "will I, won`t I ?" crap. It was all about him.....He showed he had no respect for the team, or the fans, and as such he does not deserve the respect of retiring his number and being remembered in the same way as Bart Starr (A true leader and gentleman), or any other of the Greats !!
Thats just my opinion, and I will never forgive the guy for the betrayal.
thank you bothYou have as much right to comment on Any thread as the rest of us do. Don't ever think otherwise.