Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Joe Nor Cal Packer" data-source="post: 619018" data-attributes="member: 9805">You're right he may be a little overpaid.  This is really only an issue now because Rollins and Gunter have impressed, and Randall should also impress.  But none of these three have played a down in a real NFL game.  I'm not being fatalistic or negative, I love what Gunter and especially Rollins are showing.  But I think TT signed Richardson as maybe an insurance policy.  And you rightly point out his versatility - S/LB/STs - and an intangible is desire.  I really think Richardson wants to be a Packer and I like his attitude.  And finally, your analysis leads to the question of - if Richardson gets cut, then who do they keep?  From the list you provided I'll take Richardson.  He's a known commodity (ok not a commodity but you know what I mean) and can be there if any of the rookies experience any rookie shakes in their first season, which is almost certain to happen.  Same logic in keeping him around last year before seeing how HHCD panned out.I'm much more optimistic about the secondary than I was after the draft, but c'mon, it's OTAs, a few weeks of training camp and one pre-season game.  I say keep Richardson, at least as things stand right now.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 93 (members: 0, guests: 93)