Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Who you picking? Savage or Nixon...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pizzle" data-source="post: 1030151" data-attributes="member: 12428"><p>I look at it this way:</p><p></p><p></p><p>A) Nixon is way more valuable </p><p></p><p>He's actually three different players in one-a nickel corner, a <em><span style="font-size: 18px">safety</span></em> (more on that later) AND an <strong><u>All-Pro level returner</u></strong></p><p></p><p>Hence, why he basically signed a 3 for 20M deal exactly around the range I saw his value at</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>B) New scenery will work for Savage</p><p></p><p>Savage made the dagger pick six down in Big D so he'll always be GnG to me</p><p></p><p>With that being said he didn't duplicate it in Cali while Nixon at least had that big return late</p><p></p><p>Savage signed for 3y 21M; he will surely be a starter at S for the Jaguars moving forward </p><p></p><p>The talk became too negative around him returning despite his overall postseason flashes</p><p></p><p>He gets a clean slate in JAX and a chance to build on what he did as a member of the Green+Gold career wise</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>C) How Hafley will use Nixon</p><p></p><p></p><p>4-3 base I could <em>definitely</em> envision Nixon being the other starting S alongside McKinney + 3 off-ball LBs not named Gary/Smith</p><p></p><p></p><p>He's a better tackler than Savage and is the better man-to-man cover guy; m2m will be more emphasized in the new schematics of the D</p><p></p><p>Now when we take off an LB/guy from the front to go nickel we're in the enviable position of already being able to easily disguise coverages for one little nugget of a reason-<span style="color: rgb(0, 168, 133)">our nickelback will likely already be on the field</span></p><p></p><p></p><p>Meaning, we could go 'base nickel' with SS1 go with an extra corner (CB3 CV) or go w/FS2 AJJ allowing McKinney to drop down and line up in a <span style="color: rgb(97, 189, 109)">money</span>backer-esque DB position </p><p></p><p>All the possibilities make it that more difficult to know if they're single high or split zone or man</p><p></p><p></p><p>Especially if the Pack, say, go bring back Hyde as a savvy vet with versatility to fill the SS1 spot in an actual reduced yet still technically 'starting' role within the secondary on a team-friendly 1 year contract</p><p></p><p></p><p>The net net of it is this-with K9 you're receiving 3-for-1 value at a million plus LESS than the price of a lower-tiered solid starting NFL DB in Savage </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Gute can't beat that #GPG</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pizzle, post: 1030151, member: 12428"] I look at it this way: A) Nixon is way more valuable He's actually three different players in one-a nickel corner, a [I][SIZE=5]safety[/SIZE][/I] (more on that later) AND an [B][U]All-Pro level returner[/U][/B] Hence, why he basically signed a 3 for 20M deal exactly around the range I saw his value at B) New scenery will work for Savage Savage made the dagger pick six down in Big D so he'll always be GnG to me With that being said he didn't duplicate it in Cali while Nixon at least had that big return late Savage signed for 3y 21M; he will surely be a starter at S for the Jaguars moving forward The talk became too negative around him returning despite his overall postseason flashes He gets a clean slate in JAX and a chance to build on what he did as a member of the Green+Gold career wise C) How Hafley will use Nixon 4-3 base I could [I]definitely[/I] envision Nixon being the other starting S alongside McKinney + 3 off-ball LBs not named Gary/Smith He's a better tackler than Savage and is the better man-to-man cover guy; m2m will be more emphasized in the new schematics of the D Now when we take off an LB/guy from the front to go nickel we're in the enviable position of already being able to easily disguise coverages for one little nugget of a reason-[COLOR=rgb(0, 168, 133)]our nickelback will likely already be on the field[/COLOR] Meaning, we could go 'base nickel' with SS1 go with an extra corner (CB3 CV) or go w/FS2 AJJ allowing McKinney to drop down and line up in a [COLOR=rgb(97, 189, 109)]money[/COLOR]backer-esque DB position All the possibilities make it that more difficult to know if they're single high or split zone or man Especially if the Pack, say, go bring back Hyde as a savvy vet with versatility to fill the SS1 spot in an actual reduced yet still technically 'starting' role within the secondary on a team-friendly 1 year contract The net net of it is this-with K9 you're receiving 3-for-1 value at a million plus LESS than the price of a lower-tiered solid starting NFL DB in Savage Gute can't beat that #GPG [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Pkrjones
lllrkalll
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pkrjones
9 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:07 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:43 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Half Empty
Today at 8:32 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 7:44 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Who you picking? Savage or Nixon...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
