1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

    You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
  2. Announcement is LIVE: Read the Forum Post

Who Will Deliver First Loss To 2012 Packers?

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by El Guapo, Aug 27, 2012.

  1. Croak

    Croak Terminally twisted.

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,735
    Ratings:
    +1,204
    What you wrote might be just what McCarthy thinks. But *I* can't help thinking they are concerned about winning the division first. SF in the playoffs doesn't matter if you don't first win the division. So they have a dilemma. Thanks to the scheduling geniuses in the NFL, the Packers barely have time to recuperate from the first game until they have to turn around and play against another very physical opponent. Considering, a lot of NFL players said it takes two days to get over basic soreness from one game, what does that leave for preparation for the Bears?
     
  2. Oshkoshpackfan

    Oshkoshpackfan YUT !!!

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2012
    Messages:
    3,286
    Ratings:
    +1,453
    some of you who are doubting the 49ers winning are also forgetting about how good their pass rush is and how weak our left side is. They will exploit that weakness.
     
  3. 13 Times Champs

    13 Times Champs Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,924
    Ratings:
    +1,379
    You have made a better case for losing to the Bears than the 9ers. As far as the preparation of the coaching staff I bet they are working on the Bear game plan as we speak. Winning the division is important but having the best overall record is too. btw, you don't have to win the division to be a playoff team.
     
  4. fettpett

    fettpett Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    928
    Ratings:
    +217
    Honestly, I see loosing to da Bear's before loosing to the Niners
     
  5. Croak

    Croak Terminally twisted.

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,735
    Ratings:
    +1,204
    I'm thinking the NFC East is going to be more competitive this year. Can't rule out wild card contenders in the South and West either. Coming in second in the North isn't a lock this year.
     
  6. 13 Times Champs

    13 Times Champs Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,924
    Ratings:
    +1,379
    We're getting off track here as to who we lose to first and your reasoning it will be the niners. Yes the competition is keen. That's why you have to play every game to win. In the end what gets you into the playoffs is having enough.

    In answer to your question about the 4 day in between and and the toll on the bodies of the players it is more reason to me for the Packers to try and win against SF. I don't think you believe we should rest our players against SF.
     
  7. Croak

    Croak Terminally twisted.

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,735
    Ratings:
    +1,204
    No, I don't think they'll rest them. They will play to win. I think their preparation for the Niners isn't as detailed as for the Bears. In fact I think they've already been practicing against Bear sets
    Thus less prep for the Noners make them more susceptible. IMO.

    Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  8. 13 Times Champs

    13 Times Champs Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,924
    Ratings:
    +1,379
    So the coaching staff has scaled back it's preparation for the 49 ers and are saving all for the Bears? Just a half hearted effort by them for the Whiners. ROTFLMAO!:roflmao:
     
  9. DevilDon

    DevilDon Inclement Weather Fan

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,391
    Ratings:
    +445
    Yep, no chance of that. The most important game is your next one.The Packers know the Bears also. I'm sure they've all kinds of wrinkles are in the cards for the Bears' game but no chance they are looking past the 9ers.
     
  10. Shawnsta3

    Shawnsta3 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,029
    Ratings:
    +369
    Yes, I'm picking us to lose opening weekend against the Niners.
    No, that doesn't really mean anything. There are 16 regular season games. One loss will not make or break us for the entire year. Heck, it might even help us. We've seen plenty of teams including us a few years ago, start the season struggling and get hot at the end of the year.

    I think at the very least, it would be a splash of water in the face to our guy's reminding us it's not last year and wins do not usually come that easy or often. All the other teams are improving and working hard and we have too also.

    As far as people saying "Oh, you never expect the one's they lose. Like the KC game last year, nobody expected that" Yes, in fact I did predict that. Even after KC had all their injuries at the start of the year, I figured they'd of figured out their injuries by then and guys would have either gotten healthy or other guys would have stepped up. Also I stuck by that pick the week of the game because of the coaching change and the new energy with that team and Romeo Crennell. Admittedly, I also picked us to lose to DET and NYG also which didn't turn out but were very close games that came down to the last drives.

    Not that I don't want us to win every game. But come on, I realize it's impossible to make that happen without Matt Flynn. ;)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. HardRightEdge

    HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    5,182
    Ratings:
    +2,370
    While it is reasonable to expect some work is being done on the Bears on the scouting side, you'd have to believe much more effort will be put into SF the week leading up to that game. Game week preparation is chiefly about getting the PLAYERS prepared with a game plan...if you're trying to stuff their heads with info about 2 teams simultaneously, regardless of the ratio, all you'll get is divided focus...the mental bandwidth generally won't be there for that kind of approach, especially among the younger players. Putting premature emphasis on the Bears game has a good chance of earning you two losses. I don't think I'd want to even whisper the word "Bears" to any player other than Rodgers or Woodson during the SF week preparation.

    If the suggestion is we don't prepare for SF at all to avoid the focus problem, that is of course entirely out of the question. For that one week, it's 100% about beating SF in OUR house.

    Further, putting a priority on winning Division games doesn't make a lot of sense. To state the obvious, when the season is over they add up ALL the wins and losses to see who gets Division bragging rights, not the record in the Division. Division wins have only marginal additional value...in the tie breaker after head-to-head....not enough value in it to look past ANY opponent. The best way to avoid tie breakers is to thoroughly prepare for every game with the intent of winning every game.

    While the Pack's preparation week is short for the Bears, so is the Bears' preparation week. The key is which team makes the most effective use of the limited time.

    Last season MM has downplayed winning the Division as a goal. I believe him chiefly because it is true...winning the Division is a byproduct of winning, not a goal. The goal is winning each game, one at a time.

    I think the priority on beating Division rivals over other teams is a fan and media thing. It gives the media something to hype and it gives fans bragging rights over fans of other Division fans at work or on forums...fuel for or a defense against trash talking.

    Getting all worked about beating Division rivals as a priority over others is the province of weaker teams who are out of the playoffs and looking for a consolation prize.
     
  12. Croak

    Croak Terminally twisted.

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,735
    Ratings:
    +1,204
    You make many cogent points. But being a fan since 1959, I would think you'd be aware of the importance of the Bears game. After all, Lovie Smith was supposedly hired for one reason; to beat the Packers. Don't underestimate the importance of the GB/Chi rivalry.

    In past years, as you mentioned McCarthy has game planned a couple weeks in advance when they face a shortened schedule. That's why I pointed out the Bears preparation cutting into the Niners prep. But you have a lot of good points, though I still think the Pack will lose to the Niners and handle the Bears effectively.
     
  13. Rodgers in the House

    Rodgers in the House Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2011
    Messages:
    367
    Ratings:
    +109
    You guys are seriously overrating Alex Smith. Eli has our number until proven otherwise.
     
  14. El Guapo

    El Guapo Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    2,564
    Ratings:
    +1,452
    There's no doubt that the Packers prep early for games when they have shortened weeks, but unless you provide some statistical data that clearly shows that the Packers lose the prior games....then you're argument is baseless.

    I don't think that anyone is rating Alex Smith that high. To me he is a Trent Dilfer type that rarely is the difference maker in the game, but has an incredible supporting cast. San Francisco has an outstanding defense, a strong running game, and a good receiving corps featuring Vernon Davis and Crabtree. The 49ers are a really good team, one that went further in the playoffs than our beloved Packers last season!
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. Croak

    Croak Terminally twisted.

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,735
    Ratings:
    +1,204
    I don't like "statistical data". It can be twisted however one wishes. Just look at the tripe on CHFF. My "basis" is simply my opinion. I'm not claiming anything more than that. I think Smith will do better with a better supporting cast.


    Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
     
  16. HardRightEdge

    HardRightEdge Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    5,182
    Ratings:
    +2,370
    Of course I'm aware of the weight placed on the Bears rivalry by the media and fans. It just happens to be my opinion that the touted importance of those games is misplaced. Now, whatever anybody might say to get the players and fans juiced up for ANY game is a good thing. So if the rivalry stuff works for those two games each year, go for it.

    Personally, what gets my blood rising is any game against whoever happens to be a fellow contender for the title that season, that game. If it happens to be the Bears, so be it. If we happened to lose two to the Bears and win the Superbowl, the championship would be in no way diminished...I could care less. Were a Bears fan to say, "we beat you twice...ergo we are the true champions" no reply is necessary unless you'd be inclined to laugh in his face.

    Lovie's stated objective last season was "beat Green Bay." Maybe if the mind set was "win enough games to make the playoffs" he might have had better success...well, probably not with the personnel on the field but it would be a start.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. JBlood

    JBlood Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    2,605
    Ratings:
    +1,011
    Really, 19 and 0 is possible. I don't see a loss unless we beat ourselves like we did with the turnovers against the Giants in our last loss.
     
  18. Shawnsta3

    Shawnsta3 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,029
    Ratings:
    +369
    Hate to say I told you so, But umm. I told you so.

    Not that I wanted it to happen.
     
  19. PackPackPackers

    PackPackPackers Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    148
    Ratings:
    +39
    oooops...
     
  20. Shawnsta3

    Shawnsta3 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,029
    Ratings:
    +369
    That prediction looks really solid right about now.
     
  21. greenandgold

    greenandgold I'm Dirty Hairy Callahan

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,722
    Ratings:
    +465
    Who Will Deliver First Loss To 2012 Packers?


    Guess that question is answered now.
     
  22. DevilDon

    DevilDon Inclement Weather Fan

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,391
    Ratings:
    +445
    Did you make that KC loss prediction on this forum?
    Can I beg you to predict the rest of the Packers season this year? I for one didn't see the KC game as a loss so it will help me in my future predictions. I know you have us going 0-4 to start. Thanks in advance for your assistance.
    Anxiously awaiting your prognostications,
    Dev
     
  23. Oshkoshpackfan

    Oshkoshpackfan YUT !!!

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2012
    Messages:
    3,286
    Ratings:
    +1,453
    I saw this lose coming from a mile away. I too predicted this one.

    I think it's a good thing to get that out of the way. Now we can go in all pissed off at the bears and take it out on them.
     
  24. El Guapo

    El Guapo Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    2,564
    Ratings:
    +1,452
    Agreed. That's why I started this thread in the first place. We will find out what kind of team we have pretty quick. I never mind losing to a good team like the 49ers. Losing to a lesser team would be a true letdown.
     

Share This Page