Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 949519" data-attributes="member: 10086">?? What do you call 2 Smiths + Amos + Turner?? This isn’t Ted Thompson anymore.  If you think for 1 minute that Gutey would not make a splash signing IF he had the financial means to do it you don’t know our GM very well. Depends on what you mean by “afford” when it comes to “Top Market” contracts? There has to be an offset. That comes in the form of pushing $$ onto future financial ledgers  + substantially gashing other position groups. I don’t call that “affordable”. When I think of that term I think of frugal contracts that get lots of bang for low bucks. “Affordable housing” etc.. I think your idea of affordable is inconsistent with reality.If we were +$51,000,000+ instead of <-$51,000,000->you’d be correct.We don’t have cap space, that’s a fictional term in 2022 for the Packers. We have cap deficitsYou could add “future borrowed” to “cap space” to that comment and it would be consistent and in-step with our present standing. Omission of the facts can be very damaging.How we “feel” about ordering an exquisite meal is one thing. How we “settle our debt” it is quite another. I’m not interested in doing dirty dishes to work off my Steak Ragu. I want to enjoy my juicy Matsusaka Steak and know I didn’t have to take out a loan to do it.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 829 (members: 0, guests: 829)