Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="PackAttack12" data-source="post: 947202" data-attributes="member: 11933">I think Denver was impressed with Hackett. Not sure why they wouldn't be. But I think one would be nuts to think that the potential prospect of nailing down the case to get Rodgers to Denver had nothing at all to do with it.Because it could be a scenario where Rodgers plays out his last year in Green Bay with a gutted roster and he just signs with Denver next offseason anyway. I'm not sure the Packers would be willing to take that sort of hard line approach with Rodgers, but if they are completely against moving him, and he's completely against restructuring/extending with the Packers, it's more than on the table, IMO.However, I highly doubt the Packers would be willing to lose him for nothing. So in all actuality, he's basically a free agent until further notice.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 85 (members: 0, guests: 85)