Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="FrankRizzo" data-source="post: 486653" data-attributes="member: 2232">Read the info first, then vote. McGinn has some great info on these things.Good info here, my question is which guy should they give a new, long-term contract to, first?Aaron or Clay?Rodgers or Matthews? [ATTACH=full]11142[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]11143[/ATTACH] This salary cap # info can't be right. Can it?<a href="http://www.sportscity.com/nfl/salaries/green-bay-packers-salaries/" target="_blank">http://www.sportscity.com/nfl/salaries/green-bay-packers-salaries/</a>This is some good info here, from Bob McGruff: <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/packers-salary-space-about-to-get-tight-ho6uq85-170795046.html" target="_blank">http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/packers-salary-space-about-to-get-tight-ho6uq85-170795046.html</a>IMO, Matthews deserves the new deal more than anyone not only on our team, but in the NFL.That dude has way outperformed his contract. He's as important to the defense as Rodgers is to the offense, almost.He's played 4 years on that rookie deal.There's no way in hell that we can afford Jennings back. Finley is debatable.And Woodson can't stay at that #.It really sucks that we're locked into overpaying so much for Hawk, a guy who makes no big plays... he gets paid to make big plays, not just be there.Sam Shields will get a big raise too... will we slap the 2nd round tender on him?</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,050 (members: 0, guests: 1,050)