Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
What To Make Of Our WR No-Shows
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 911174"><p>I agree that it would be foolish not to trade Adams if it's obvious he doesn't plan on re-signing with the Packers after the upcoming season. I don't consider him not showing up for voluntary workouts as evidence for that to be certain by any means.</p><p></p><p>I was wrong about the front office being idiots because of not approching Rodgers about restructuring his contract. They made a huge mistake allowing it to get to a point where the quarterback is seriously considering not playing for the team anymore though.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It could end up with the Packers not being a playoff contender for the next decade as well though.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm curious about how that running back performs once opponents don't have to primarily concentrate on containing Rodgers.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The Packers don't cripple their cap by trading Rodgers. They would have to deal with having a lot less talent at quarterback though.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Just for the record, you forgot to account for the $6.8 million roster bonus Rodgers received in March. Theefore trading him would result in a total of $38.356 million of dead money counting against the cap.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The Broncos would immediately become a playoff contender with the Rodgers, resulting in the picks acquired most likely being closer to the end of each round. </p><p></p><p>It's not realistic to expect the Packers to easily win half of their games without Rodgers.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>A team trading for Rodgers would have to pay him only $65.7 million ($21.9 million average) over the next three seasons under his current deal.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If the Packers trade Rodgers there's no reason to be worried about the Rams but rather staying ahead of the Lions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 911174"] I agree that it would be foolish not to trade Adams if it's obvious he doesn't plan on re-signing with the Packers after the upcoming season. I don't consider him not showing up for voluntary workouts as evidence for that to be certain by any means. I was wrong about the front office being idiots because of not approching Rodgers about restructuring his contract. They made a huge mistake allowing it to get to a point where the quarterback is seriously considering not playing for the team anymore though. It could end up with the Packers not being a playoff contender for the next decade as well though. I'm curious about how that running back performs once opponents don't have to primarily concentrate on containing Rodgers. The Packers don't cripple their cap by trading Rodgers. They would have to deal with having a lot less talent at quarterback though. Just for the record, you forgot to account for the $6.8 million roster bonus Rodgers received in March. Theefore trading him would result in a total of $38.356 million of dead money counting against the cap. The Broncos would immediately become a playoff contender with the Rodgers, resulting in the picks acquired most likely being closer to the end of each round. It's not realistic to expect the Packers to easily win half of their games without Rodgers. A team trading for Rodgers would have to pay him only $65.7 million ($21.9 million average) over the next three seasons under his current deal. If the Packers trade Rodgers there's no reason to be worried about the Rams but rather staying ahead of the Lions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
44 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Yesterday at 11:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 8:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 WR room
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 6:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:47 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
What To Make Of Our WR No-Shows
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
