Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 524175" data-attributes="member: 4300">But we’ve seen him evolve and you even mention one example. And he’s done so beyond just learning to stop the read option. It may be time for Capers to go but not because he hasn't "evolved". IMO there is ample evidence Thompson doesn’t use “BPA”; instead he uses best value available. And how would Perry have done if he never got seriously injured? His acquisition allowed them to put Matthews on his preferred side. As a prospect Perry was big and athletic and well suited for the SOLB IMO.  If Rodgers hadn’t gotten injured and the Packers were still leading the division, would you be posting the same thing? Of course not. So IMO that one event has you, and others overreacting.  “Like” Harrell? OK, name all the others Thompson drafted in the early rounds who had similar injury histories. BTW, I disagree with JBlood: I believe Harrell’s injury history went back to high school.  “Livid” about not keeping Crabtree? Wow. So he’s the difference between their current record and what? Again, if Rodgers didn’t get injured, how important would Crabtree be? IMO this is just one of many emotional overreactions by Packers fans who justifiably had high hopes which have been dashed, at least for the time being, by the Rodgers’ injury.</blockquote>

Total: 291 (members: 1, guests: 290)