Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Quientus" data-source="post: 257339" data-attributes="member: 1834">I know you said second year ... - Which is why I said it was a "modied" truth, because it can be argued both ways, in terms of which season was the "Starting season" ... <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" data-shortname=":)" />And I agree ... It's never easy to replace a "Living Legend", no matter who you are ... But taking all that aside ... From an overall team perspective, I would say that Favre did play "below paar" in his first couple of years ... - However there is a difference ... - Favre didn't have the opportunity to sit behind a seasoned leader and veteran for a couple of seasons, like Rodgers ..., and that is one of the main reasons why I just don't understand Rodgers atm ...Romo too sat behind a seasoned leader and "veteran" before coming into the games as well, before giving the starting job ... And even though the Cowboys haven't "produced" yet in the play-offs that is one example where it actually paid off ... - Whereas in Rodgers case ... I am beginning to think (hindsight is 20/20), he would have benefitted more from just being thrown in there (like Favre) ...</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 535 (members: 0, guests: 535)