1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

We just traded again #93 To Saint Louis

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by Chamuko, Apr 29, 2006.

  1. Chamuko

    Chamuko Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,067
    Ratings:
    +0
    Still no info on what we got... Maybe a couple of late rounders.... I dont know I just dont like this last trade, either TT is a freeaking jenious and knows a lot more than most of the people on the NFL or we are letting talent go away in order to get more bodies... quantity over quality ???
     
  2. all about da packers

    all about da packers Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    7,033
    Ratings:
    +0
    Chamuko, check your PM. :)
     
  3. all about da packers

    all about da packers Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    7,033
    Ratings:
    +0
    Packers get picks number 109 (4th round) and 183 (6th round).
     
  4. PackOne

    PackOne Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    Messages:
    2,013
    Ratings:
    +4
    Maybe we will end up with 23 7th rounders ?
     
  5. Canadian packer

    Canadian packer Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Messages:
    83
    Ratings:
    +0
    There should be good value in the 7th round....terrible draft by packers
     
  6. CaliforniaCheez

    CaliforniaCheez Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Messages:
    2,486
    Ratings:
    +0
    The last trade down(93) should have included a fifth round pick.

    The trade value chart shows the Packers getting taken to the cleaners!!
     
  7. tromadz

    tromadz Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,000
    Ratings:
    +3
    wasnt the general concensus that the trade chart is retarded?
     
  8. Canadian packer

    Canadian packer Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Messages:
    83
    Ratings:
    +0
    Maybe TT can trade all our this years picks for some next year so he doesn't have to draft any more players this year
     
  9. tromadz

    tromadz Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,000
    Ratings:
    +3
    :roll:
     
  10. longtimefan

    longtimefan Super Moderator Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Messages:
    17,841
    Ratings:
    +3,485
    As one talent evaluator stated, teams who treat the chart as gospel either (a) don't understand math or (b) don't have the guts to trust their instincts and make a decision without looking at the numbers. John Butler was a very well-respected, competent evaluator who trusted his instincts more than some forumla originally devised at MIT.


    http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW/NF ... eValue.htm
     
  11. Popcynical

    Popcynical Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2005
    Messages:
    519
    Ratings:
    +0
    If this means more of a chance of us getting Setterstrom, I'm fine with it. Imagine Eslinger and Setterstrom.. mm..
     
  12. mattresell

    mattresell Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    424
    Ratings:
    +0
    Good point. Formulas designed by those highly intelligent people MIT can't carry any real value can they? Sure they may have studied the history of the draft and tracked how each pick performed to come up with a logical conclusion as to the estimated value of each draft pick, but they're dorks right? No way I listen to them. The fact is I've seen ALMOST 10% of the college guys play this year and have done no extensive research on any of them. Those draft boards don't mean **** compared to what I know!

    Paragraph above is laced with sarcasm - in case you didn't get it.
     

Share This Page