Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="morningwood" data-source="post: 447618" data-attributes="member: 2110">Again, it's the way that Mary Jo, who had the benefit of reviewing the document, chose to describe it the public who had not seen it.  From the way she described the document one would expect that at the very least Hargrove had explicitly  said: -A bounty program existed during the time a was a member of the Saints;-I was personally aware of the existence of the program;-I particpated in it.In fact, because Mary Jo boldy stated that the declaration "established" (as opposed to merely stating that he alleged), one might reasonably have expected that he had provided details of the program.   For example, "I received a bounty for...."  or "I contributed....." It seems to me that every time we get a glimpse of the hard evidence we see that the NFL has chosen to exagerate and/or mislead the public.    It has been that way from the beginning.   For example, I will bet that after reading the NFL's initial press release you came away thinking that the NFL had 18,000 documents comprising over 50,000 pages of evidence.   Am I right?</blockquote>

Total: 648 (members: 3, guests: 645)