Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
NFL Discussions
Vilma a scapegoat?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="packa7x" data-source="post: 447510" data-attributes="member: 6594"><p>Don't look at the document in a vacuum. Since we know a bounty system existed, the "affidavit" (it's not really an affidavit) Confirms what we know. Even if we didn't know it...</p><p></p><p>"Williams said he was going to deny the existence of any bounty on any player to the NFL, and I should deny it, too. Coach Vitt also said he was going to deny the existence of any bounties. Coach Williams said: "Those motherf-uckers [the NFL] have been trying to get me for years," and if we all "stay on the same page, this will blow over."</p><p></p><p>"They told me that when the NFL asked me about any bounty or bounty program, I should "just play dumb."</p><p></p><p>Coach Williams said the NFL has been trying to get him for years on the bounty scandal, which he admitted to, and if we all "stay on the same page, this will blow over," is telling. Because we know a bounty system exists, we know that "staying on the same page" means all lying together since Hargrove was instructed to deny the existence and Vitt and Williams would do the same. </p><p></p><p>So we clearly have him lying and we know for a fact the bounty system was in fact there even if this was corroborating evidence. So yes, it established a bounty system. In turn, that establishes Hargrove's knowledge of it. If we know there was a bounty system, Hargrove knew about it because he was told to deny the bounty system. Because he actively lied about the bounty system, that establishes his participation in it. The NFL never claimed he contributed or received money, just that he participated. Lying about it is being involved and participating.</p><p></p><p>Again, stop looking at this in a vacuum. As a lawyer, I'm sure you don't base your cases off of one affidavit with no other evidence.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="packa7x, post: 447510, member: 6594"] Don't look at the document in a vacuum. Since we know a bounty system existed, the "affidavit" (it's not really an affidavit) Confirms what we know. Even if we didn't know it... "Williams said he was going to deny the existence of any bounty on any player to the NFL, and I should deny it, too. Coach Vitt also said he was going to deny the existence of any bounties. Coach Williams said: "Those motherf-uckers [the NFL] have been trying to get me for years," and if we all "stay on the same page, this will blow over." "They told me that when the NFL asked me about any bounty or bounty program, I should "just play dumb." Coach Williams said the NFL has been trying to get him for years on the bounty scandal, which he admitted to, and if we all "stay on the same page, this will blow over," is telling. Because we know a bounty system exists, we know that "staying on the same page" means all lying together since Hargrove was instructed to deny the existence and Vitt and Williams would do the same. So we clearly have him lying and we know for a fact the bounty system was in fact there even if this was corroborating evidence. So yes, it established a bounty system. In turn, that establishes Hargrove's knowledge of it. If we know there was a bounty system, Hargrove knew about it because he was told to deny the bounty system. Because he actively lied about the bounty system, that establishes his participation in it. The NFL never claimed he contributed or received money, just that he participated. Lying about it is being involved and participating. Again, stop looking at this in a vacuum. As a lawyer, I'm sure you don't base your cases off of one affidavit with no other evidence. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: milani
38 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: CarryTheG14
Today at 12:24 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Magooch
Today at 11:43 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
P
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pugger
Today at 10:17 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: Curly Calhoun
Today at 8:28 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
NFL Discussions
Vilma a scapegoat?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
