Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="morningwood" data-source="post: 447472" data-attributes="member: 2110">You need to read the affidavit again. Hargrove may have very well have lied. And, he may very well have participated in a "bounty program." However, he does not say that in his affidavit. Also, notice in the last paragraph that he specifcally uses "alleged" to describe "bounty program." You can argue that there is a reasonable inference that he lied, but you can't say that he actually states that he lied. Furthermore, there is absolutely nothing in his affidavit that indicates that he "participated" in a bounty program.I am not sure what you meant when you said, "lying about the Bounty scandal proves participation." Given the fact you followed that statement with your "getaway driver" analogy I presume you meant he was guilty as an accessory after the fact. If that is the case, it would have been more accurate for you to have declared, "lying about the Bounty scandal constitutes participation." In any event, I don't think that Mary Jo was trying to convey that theory when she stated that "Hargrove submitted a signed declaration to the league that established not only the existence of the program at the Saints, but also that he knew about and participated in it." Again, read the affidvit.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,145 (members: 0, guests: 1,145)