Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 1080518" data-attributes="member: 7261">Oh for sure, I wasn't disagreeing with you and I am glad that you recognized that. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" data-shortname=";)" />  If anything I was adding to your notion that Jacobs is here to stay.  A new deal, with an extension, I would agree with you on.  I believe Jacobs missed his first game yesterday as a Packer.  So, as far as other players like Kraft and Watson being #1 threats, they have to stay healthy to be a threat.  The drop in the offense without Kraft is noticeable.  If Watson hadn't come back recently, where would the Packers be without Jacobs, Kraft and Watson?Jacobs is a special kind of RB and while I am fine with having Wilson as his backup, it would be silly to trade Jacobs away for a day 3 pick and then rely on Wilson to do what Jacobs has done.  I am never opposed to drafting RB's but as we have seen (in the NFL) way too many times, that is a crapshoot as well.  Stick with a proven and reliable RB, that isn't a big drag on your salary cap.</blockquote>

Total: 747 (members: 3, guests: 744)