Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2013 Draft Archive
Vikings Draft
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BorderRivals.com" data-source="post: 498403" data-attributes="member: 6416"><p>Cordarrelle Patterson: 6'2", 216 lbs, 4.33 40-yard dash, 37" vertical, 10'6" broad jump - 1-year of D1 play</p><p>Charles Johnson: 6'2", 215 lbs, 4.38 40-yard dash, 39-1/2" vertical, 11'-1" broad jump</p><p> </p><p>There's a reason Johnson went in the 7th - off-field issues and lesser competition. But, since Patterson can't run routes, he's pure athlete. And, as you can see, Johnson's athletic talents are equal. So, both are raw projects. One went in the first, costing the Vikes multiple picks, and one went in the 7th. Vikes' progress will be hurt - a lot - if Patterson doesn't pan out. If Johnson doesn't pan out, it doesn't cost the Packers anything.</p><p> </p><p>Oh yeah, we also have a QB that can make Johnson better.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BorderRivals.com, post: 498403, member: 6416"] Cordarrelle Patterson: 6'2", 216 lbs, 4.33 40-yard dash, 37" vertical, 10'6" broad jump - 1-year of D1 play Charles Johnson: 6'2", 215 lbs, 4.38 40-yard dash, 39-1/2" vertical, 11'-1" broad jump There's a reason Johnson went in the 7th - off-field issues and lesser competition. But, since Patterson can't run routes, he's pure athlete. And, as you can see, Johnson's athletic talents are equal. So, both are raw projects. One went in the first, costing the Vikes multiple picks, and one went in the 7th. Vikes' progress will be hurt - a lot - if Patterson doesn't pan out. If Johnson doesn't pan out, it doesn't cost the Packers anything. Oh yeah, we also have a QB that can make Johnson better. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
The General
Latest posts
Pick 124 Barryn Sorrell Edge Texas
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 4:16 AM
Draft Talk
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:37 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 NFL Schedule Release
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 10:28 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
First Round Prospect Discussions Specifically
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 7:28 PM
Draft Talk
R
Mike McCarthy Gone
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 3:18 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2013 Draft Archive
Vikings Draft
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top