Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
NFL Discussions
Tyreek Hill Trade!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 953925" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>Yeah - most of the draft capital charts have it being fairly equal.</p><p></p><p>The older Jimmy Johnson model has the value of the picks we received from LV totaled at 1,150.</p><p>By the same measure the picks KC received for 2022 are valued at 1,092. Of course they are also receiving a 4th and a 6th next year. Generally speaking when calculating "value" they say the rule of thumb is that future picks should be downgraded a year, so approx. the value of a 5th and 7th in 2022. A middle-of-the-round 5th and 7th in 2022 would add about 26 points of value, for a total of 1,118.</p><p></p><p>The newer Rich Hill model is more or less in line with that too.</p><p>It values the picks we got from LV at 359 points; KC's 2022 picks are valued at 343 plus approximately 12 points of value for next year's picks, for a total of 355 points.</p><p></p><p>Edit: Something else to consider is that KC was negotiating with multiple teams (At least two) while it sounds like Davante really only ever wanted LV. Obviously that decreases our leverage so I think in some ways it's a bit impressive that we managed to get more or less the same value for a player who's one year older and only ever wanted to go to one team vs a player who's younger and had multiple options on the table, seemingly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 953925, member: 17987"] Yeah - most of the draft capital charts have it being fairly equal. The older Jimmy Johnson model has the value of the picks we received from LV totaled at 1,150. By the same measure the picks KC received for 2022 are valued at 1,092. Of course they are also receiving a 4th and a 6th next year. Generally speaking when calculating "value" they say the rule of thumb is that future picks should be downgraded a year, so approx. the value of a 5th and 7th in 2022. A middle-of-the-round 5th and 7th in 2022 would add about 26 points of value, for a total of 1,118. The newer Rich Hill model is more or less in line with that too. It values the picks we got from LV at 359 points; KC's 2022 picks are valued at 343 plus approximately 12 points of value for next year's picks, for a total of 355 points. Edit: Something else to consider is that KC was negotiating with multiple teams (At least two) while it sounds like Davante really only ever wanted LV. Obviously that decreases our leverage so I think in some ways it's a bit impressive that we managed to get more or less the same value for a player who's one year older and only ever wanted to go to one team vs a player who's younger and had multiple options on the table, seemingly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DoURant
Latest posts
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: gopkrs
30 minutes ago
College Sports
Starting 5 - CB
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 1:37 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC North Draft Review (2025)
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 1:36 PM
Draft Talk
2022 Draft Romeo Doubs #132
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 11:56 AM
Draft Talk
Mediocre punters from da past and other things....
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 10:39 AM
NFL Discussions
Forums
Open Football Discussion
NFL Discussions
Tyreek Hill Trade!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top