Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 657366" data-attributes="member: 7261">While I am in the camp of TT under uses FA's, your post makes it sound as if hitting the FA Market "hard" is the only way to win a Super Bowl.  Actually, much of the information points the opposite direction.  You are quick to point out a few of the scattered successes of teams that won SB's but how about all the teams that also hit the FA market "hard" and didn't?As Captain WIIM states often, TT has a lot of options available to him to build a quality team, FA's just seem to be one he under utilizes.These are the types of articles you find all over the net, so it seems to be the majority view:<a href="http://lastwordonsports.com/2016/03/10/building-free-agency-doesnt-work/" target="_blank">http://lastwordonsports.com/2016/03/10/building-free-agency-doesnt-work/</a>This sums up my feelings on the FA gamble:"The reality is that while teams already have film of free agents playing against NFL talent, each team is different. Every team runs a different scheme, with different talent, and different coaches. A player could be dominant in one system, and completely worthless in another. As a result, film on free agents can be either very insightful, or completely irrelevant. Free agency is ultimately a crap shoot."</blockquote>

Total: 866 (members: 2, guests: 864)