Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1095275" data-attributes="member: 10086">This WR trade almost surely locks down Watson from trade talks. Di much so we could almost rename the thread imo.See I think you’re overemphasizing lack of depth.Also as you turn a Roster by position group you have to balance the bigger contract with some Rookie deals.GB could technically go into the season without drafting at WR. I’m being serious.Watson year 5Reed year 4Savion Year 2Golden year 2Melton year 4Skyy year 5Imo GB SHOULD draft 1 WR before RD6 area. Yet if we didn’t we could function no problem. I also like Sheppard. That cat looked great last Preseason. He was one of our top 10 most impressive offensive players last year and I think had a real shot from the bottom of unknowns. We were just too stacked. As it is Sheppard is all the way into Practice squad already.That’s our problem. Either Kraft being a regular target we’ve got so many options that Wicks is an afterthought. I don’t think he’s bad, he’s just covered up with a Star TE1, plus 3 WR2 types.</blockquote>

Total: 1,726 (members: 1, guests: 1,725)