Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sanguine camper" data-source="post: 1095266" data-attributes="member: 9744">The Packers would get a 2027 comp pick for Wicks. He would've played a big role in 2026. Its the Packers, you can count on plenty of injuries. Depth players are more valuable on the Packers because of that reason. I agree that there are probably other issues involved in dumping Wicks. He may be unhappy and complaining about his backup role. Another problem with the trade is that it helps Philly. They have handled the Packers to say the least and making them that much harder to overcome in any playoff scenario isn't smart if you think the Packers are a 2026 contender.Perhaps given the big injury load, 2026 has been discounted in favor of ramping up for a run in 2027.</blockquote>

Total: 1,726 (members: 1, guests: 1,725)