Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 1094820" data-attributes="member: 17987">I think that's fair although I guess I would have to ask if this dilemma actually exists in the first place? I mean obviously there ARE cap constraints and all that, but I guess what I mean is that I haven't heard any reporting suggesting that the team is viewing it in such a way as "Kraft + ???" vs "Watson". I think they have every intention of extending both Kraft and Watson (and if that comes at the expense of a Doubs type player, or a Wicks or Reed or whoever....I'm totally fine with that)in other words, I think the question is more....would you rather have Kraft and (whoever) with no Watson, or more likely Watson and Kraft and be okay with losing another player(s) to accommodate</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,019 (members: 1, guests: 1,018)