Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 1094737" data-attributes="member: 4199">Once again, you're ignoring what I have said and putting words in my mouth.  My first comment on this sub-thread, comment #46: "All that said, if you had to chose, I'm not sure it's as easy as you think. We have those handy stats about how much better Watson is when he is on the field, even when not targeted. I'd need to see those same stats for Kraft before I pick."Please re-read that comment.  No where did I say I we can or cannot talk about financial benefits.  No where did I say we cannot talk about blocking.  No where did I say we can't talk about value offset.  I have been making two points, maybe three depending how you slice it.1. Watson being on the field has a measurable, positive impact on the offense.  We have these stats.  1a. I am not aware of similar stats for Kraft. I AM NOT SAYING THEY DO NOT EXIST, MERELY I HAVE NOT SEEN THEM.  IF THEY DO EXIST, I WANT TO SEE THEM!2. Given 1 above, Watson vs. Kraft is not a simple as comparing their receiving output.  Those are my points.My comments about "2-high" was supposition as to why Watson improves the offense. There could be other reasons.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 660 (members: 0, guests: 660)