Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Trade Up Targets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1032155" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>I’ve also found myself focusing on either Edgerrin or Colson at LB. A choice of either of those 2 LB’s can be instrumental to our success now that Campbell is gone. Possibly even an upgrade. Plus we likely need 2 LB’s and getting 1 of them earlier allows us to wait until later in the draft to snatch another LB or bigger Safety who is well versed in coverage but is effective in Run Stop and can be effective in the Box. Savage could not do that and Amos was the last one who was good.. but not great he’d get washed out some. </p><p>I think 41 is too early for LB (just my opinion it’s a slight reach) but I’d absolutely take 1 of those guys if we traded back in they 46-49 area and got us an extra 4th. Then I can live with it. Now I’ve got my Premier iLB + RG using 41.</p><p></p><p>This also enables me to grab a bonus selection. IF a good TE or good WR is falling hard? Such as a top 75 graded player is in mid round Rd 4 sniffing our selection? I’m on him like flies on poop</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1032155, member: 10086"] I’ve also found myself focusing on either Edgerrin or Colson at LB. A choice of either of those 2 LB’s can be instrumental to our success now that Campbell is gone. Possibly even an upgrade. Plus we likely need 2 LB’s and getting 1 of them earlier allows us to wait until later in the draft to snatch another LB or bigger Safety who is well versed in coverage but is effective in Run Stop and can be effective in the Box. Savage could not do that and Amos was the last one who was good.. but not great he’d get washed out some. I think 41 is too early for LB (just my opinion it’s a slight reach) but I’d absolutely take 1 of those guys if we traded back in they 46-49 area and got us an extra 4th. Then I can live with it. Now I’ve got my Premier iLB + RG using 41. This also enables me to grab a bonus selection. IF a good TE or good WR is falling hard? Such as a top 75 graded player is in mid round Rd 4 sniffing our selection? I’m on him like flies on poop [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Mediocre punters from da past and other things....
Latest: gopkrs
32 minutes ago
NFL Discussions
NFC North Predictions
Latest: Pkrjones
38 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Da Bears new head coach!!!!!
Latest: Calebs Revenge
44 minutes ago
NFL Discussions
First Round Pick #23 - Matthew Golden WR - Texas
Latest: DoURant
Today at 6:12 PM
Draft Talk
S
Away Stadium You Would Like to Visit
Latest: shockerx
Today at 4:27 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Trade Up Targets
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top