Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Trade Malik Willis
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tynimiller" data-source="post: 1071112" data-attributes="member: 6578"><p>I understand the sentiment but if I'm in the GM's seat, there isn't a back up on the team that isn't tradeable for the right amount of return. I know I've presented both arguments for and against trading multiple guys - but in the end the decision to trade or not trade a guy in a year where you seemed to have a legit window for the Bowl does add some complexity to it for sure for Gute and Co.</p><p></p><p>You also though have to factor in injuries because they can hit at any point and be a wrinkle to the fabric of a team as well.</p><p></p><p>I still say or lean that there is a higher percent chance that someone is getting traded vs not. Now I'm more like 55%/45% or even closer to 50/50 but I think I am still there. The roster structure, turnover issues of likely departures for nothing and such are just something I know Gute doesn't like. </p><p></p><p>BUT one counter to this is the fact that we shored up Watson for a year - delaying his future discussion, we gave Wyatt the 5th year option - delaying his one year, we are seemingly trying to shore up Quay for a two or three year time - delaying his as well....the list of potential guys that could leave in FA is shrinking - which does I think lesson the odds - BUT one thing a buddy reminded me was we essentially just massively INCREASED the issues next year - which doubles down the logic of we are pushing ALL IN for two seasons (this year and next). The offseason after next season we have this GROUP EXPIRING CONTRACTS:</p><p></p><p>Reed</p><p>Wicks</p><p>Kraft</p><p>Musgrave</p><p>Wooden</p><p>Brooks</p><p>Valentine</p><p><strong>NEWLY ADDED:</strong></p><p>Watson</p><p>Wyatt</p><p></p><p>LVN potentially if we don't pick up 5th year option.</p><p></p><p>Now to be fair it's a discussion which doesn't need handled right now. BUT if they get Quay extended....you essentially despite having limited draft picks this next year, I argue our future needs align with having no Day1 pick to bolster and replenish:</p><p></p><p>TE - historically amazing TEs can be had Day2...this one clearly needing someone added is not a bad thing at all with limited draft capital IMO.</p><p>WR - Gute has proven fully capable of Day2 and early Day3 locating solid WR4 type guys at worst...</p><p>DL - Depth along the front has been a very hit or miss thing but that is how it is across the NFL...if Warren Brinson and Stackhouse show immense potential solid chance we only need another depth rotational guy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tynimiller, post: 1071112, member: 6578"] I understand the sentiment but if I'm in the GM's seat, there isn't a back up on the team that isn't tradeable for the right amount of return. I know I've presented both arguments for and against trading multiple guys - but in the end the decision to trade or not trade a guy in a year where you seemed to have a legit window for the Bowl does add some complexity to it for sure for Gute and Co. You also though have to factor in injuries because they can hit at any point and be a wrinkle to the fabric of a team as well. I still say or lean that there is a higher percent chance that someone is getting traded vs not. Now I'm more like 55%/45% or even closer to 50/50 but I think I am still there. The roster structure, turnover issues of likely departures for nothing and such are just something I know Gute doesn't like. BUT one counter to this is the fact that we shored up Watson for a year - delaying his future discussion, we gave Wyatt the 5th year option - delaying his one year, we are seemingly trying to shore up Quay for a two or three year time - delaying his as well....the list of potential guys that could leave in FA is shrinking - which does I think lesson the odds - BUT one thing a buddy reminded me was we essentially just massively INCREASED the issues next year - which doubles down the logic of we are pushing ALL IN for two seasons (this year and next). The offseason after next season we have this GROUP EXPIRING CONTRACTS: Reed Wicks Kraft Musgrave Wooden Brooks Valentine [B]NEWLY ADDED:[/B] Watson Wyatt LVN potentially if we don't pick up 5th year option. Now to be fair it's a discussion which doesn't need handled right now. BUT if they get Quay extended....you essentially despite having limited draft picks this next year, I argue our future needs align with having no Day1 pick to bolster and replenish: TE - historically amazing TEs can be had Day2...this one clearly needing someone added is not a bad thing at all with limited draft capital IMO. WR - Gute has proven fully capable of Day2 and early Day3 locating solid WR4 type guys at worst... DL - Depth along the front has been a very hit or miss thing but that is how it is across the NFL...if Warren Brinson and Stackhouse show immense potential solid chance we only need another depth rotational guy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Magooch
Capitol 8805
mradtke66
Latest posts
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Voyageur
1 minute ago
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Voyageur
47 minutes ago
Movies and Entertainment
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 12:29 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: CarryTheG14
Today at 11:42 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:48 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Trade Malik Willis
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top