Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 877024" data-attributes="member: 10086">I think it’s logical that the only way Love sees a starting role isn’t until 2022 (his 3rd season). That’s considered our “contract out” and it would take both Rodgers regressing further (for any variety of reasons)  and Love showing promise. Otherwise it’s far more plausible in 2023 or Rodgers gets a short term deal. Much can happen in three seasons.Like you said, in the meantime, Love does provide value because he commands a roster spot. Nobody stays in the 53 unless they present value, regardless of how some novice fans try to spin it.One could even present this question for thought?  If each team was forced to make additional roster cuts from the traditional #53 until they chose to lose their backup QB. At which roster spot would they kick their #2 QB to the curb on average? We know it wouldn’t be the first #22 players (11 Offense, 11 Defense)  plus the P & K. But we also know he’s not the first to go either? Backup QB position presents value even if he never sees the field. He’s the most important backup after the starting roster.I’ll start.. I put QB#2 just before the #34/#53 spot.  Actually maybe a tad sooner because Love could play ST if needed.  I’d call him a top #30 type roster spot. Some Posters in here are acting like #2QB would be a practice squad level value (or worse)</blockquote>

Total: 280 (members: 3, guests: 277)