Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 976860">What's the point of brining it up if you don't believe it happened???While that might be true there's no doubt in my mind that a wide receiver like Claypool would have significantly improved the offense. If the Packers traded for a player still on his rookie deal it wouldn't have resulted in any significant cap hit.No, it's much better spending it on a player who never plays any meaningful snaps for the team  <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/rolleyes.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes    :rolleyes:" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> The bottom line is Gutekunst once again missed out on improving the team at the trade deadline. It doesn't matter if he was in on any players or not, he didn't get it done. Period.While the defense has definitely been the better unit this season they haven't performed up to expectations. Therefore I'm more disappointed in them than the offense.In my opinion Gutekunst deserves the majority of blame for the offense struggling because of a lack of talent.</blockquote>

Total: 1,020 (members: 2, guests: 1,018)