Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Trade Deadline Targets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 976530" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>I mean, *maybe* so, but the same is true for a lot of situations, no? Miami got Chubb for "just" a first and scraps. Chicago got Claypool for a second. Pittsburgh traded a conditional 6th for Williams Jackson III and a conditional 7th and Washington was heavily reported to be ready to cut him outright. Chiefs got Toney for a 3rd round comp pick and a 6th. And so on...There are a lot of deals out there for which it's easy to look at and think "A lot of teams would have paid that," but obviously only one ever does... </p><p></p><p>I suspect it's probably more likely the case that while Denver might've been asking for more than that, we were probably only interested in giving up SIGNIFICANTLY less, so it's moot.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 976530, member: 17987"] I mean, *maybe* so, but the same is true for a lot of situations, no? Miami got Chubb for "just" a first and scraps. Chicago got Claypool for a second. Pittsburgh traded a conditional 6th for Williams Jackson III and a conditional 7th and Washington was heavily reported to be ready to cut him outright. Chiefs got Toney for a 3rd round comp pick and a 6th. And so on...There are a lot of deals out there for which it's easy to look at and think "A lot of teams would have paid that," but obviously only one ever does... I suspect it's probably more likely the case that while Denver might've been asking for more than that, we were probably only interested in giving up SIGNIFICANTLY less, so it's moot. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DoURant
Canadian Cheddar
yxz1000r
Latest posts
All Things Brandon Mcnamus
Latest: OldSchool101
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pivotal Plays of Week 8 - Jaguars
Latest: OldSchool101
5 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Studs and Duds - Jacksonville
Latest: OldSchool101
13 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFL 2024 Weekly Predictions Contest: Week 9
Latest: OldSchool101
14 minutes ago
NFL Discussions
Jamin Davis (Former 1st Rounder) Picked Up - Discussion
Latest: OldSchool101
35 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Trade Deadline Targets
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top