Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Trade Deadline Targets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 885845"><p>Fans need to stop believing that other teams are interested in trading young players because they would address their own team's needs and their contracts could be fit under the cap as well.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The Packers trading Wagner, Turner, Z, Amos and Clark would result in them taking an additional cap hit based on the prorated portion of the signing bonus still remaining immediately counting against the cap. The savings by trading Adams would be below $3 million because of it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't know where you've got that numbers from but Preston being on pace to be targeted 29 times up from 16 last season is a pretty strong indicator he's dropping into coverage more often.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, in that case there would be some smarter moves than spending it on Aaron and Julio. In addition I don't consider moving on from Preston to be a good idea.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't believe it would be smart to give up that much draft capital for a rental player.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, the Packers would save $8 million of cap space by releasing Preston before the third day of the 2021 league year. While they wouldn't have to pay hima total of $12 million in cash next year the $4 million prorated signing bonus for 2022 would count as dead money against the cap in '21.</p><p></p><p>If they decide to move on from him after the roster bonus is paid they would save only $4 million in cap space for next season.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Fuller would still count $5.4 million towards the Packers cap for the rest of this season if acquired at the trade deadline.</p><p></p><p>Tate would be a bit cheaper at $4.2 million but still too expensive in my opinion.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Please, don't believe everything you read on Twitter.</p><p></p><p>The Saints can't afford to trade Thomas as they desperately need to save cap space but would take an additional hit of nearly $6.7 million for the 2021 season by shipping him to another team.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>All players on offense contributed to that meltdown.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 885845"] Fans need to stop believing that other teams are interested in trading young players because they would address their own team's needs and their contracts could be fit under the cap as well. The Packers trading Wagner, Turner, Z, Amos and Clark would result in them taking an additional cap hit based on the prorated portion of the signing bonus still remaining immediately counting against the cap. The savings by trading Adams would be below $3 million because of it. I don't know where you've got that numbers from but Preston being on pace to be targeted 29 times up from 16 last season is a pretty strong indicator he's dropping into coverage more often. Well, in that case there would be some smarter moves than spending it on Aaron and Julio. In addition I don't consider moving on from Preston to be a good idea. I don't believe it would be smart to give up that much draft capital for a rental player. No, the Packers would save $8 million of cap space by releasing Preston before the third day of the 2021 league year. While they wouldn't have to pay hima total of $12 million in cash next year the $4 million prorated signing bonus for 2022 would count as dead money against the cap in '21. If they decide to move on from him after the roster bonus is paid they would save only $4 million in cap space for next season. Fuller would still count $5.4 million towards the Packers cap for the rest of this season if acquired at the trade deadline. Tate would be a bit cheaper at $4.2 million but still too expensive in my opinion. Please, don't believe everything you read on Twitter. The Saints can't afford to trade Thomas as they desperately need to save cap space but would take an additional hit of nearly $6.7 million for the 2021 season by shipping him to another team. All players on offense contributed to that meltdown. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Capitol 8805
CarryTheG14
Latest posts
F
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Firethorn1001
41 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
Today at 11:53 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:44 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 7:18 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Trade Deadline Targets
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
