Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="bigbubbatd" data-source="post: 686109" data-attributes="member: 10784">Last thing on the Vikings. People keep bringing how Denver had a really bad offense but was still able to win a super bowl with their defense. Here is the main issues I have with that comparison1. The broncos offense was ranked 16th in the NFL in yards per game. The Vikings are 30th. The Broncos had 60 yards more per game than the Vikings.2. Points per game is also in Denver favor by 3 but I would guess it would jump to 5 or 6 if you took out defensive tds3. Denver could at least sustain a drive. 314 first downs. The Vikings are on pace for 260 or so.  That is the difference between new England and Cleveland last year4. Ypa passing are almost equal but Denver had a 1.5 ypc difference. That is huge. Minnesota is at a dreadful 2.7 ypc. It has actually been that way all year even when ap was playingAnd these numbers have been true most of the year. The Packers are not chasing a team similar to last year's Broncos</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,135 (members: 0, guests: 1,135)