1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

Top Ten...

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by Zero2Cool, Mar 16, 2006.

  1. Zero2Cool

    Zero2Cool I own a website

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,903
    Ratings:
    +8
  2. CalifPacker

    CalifPacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    757
    Ratings:
    +1
    I'll take him too. That would fix another key spot.
     
  3. Heatherthepackgirl

    Heatherthepackgirl Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    2,274
    Ratings:
    +0
    Keeping fingers crossed that we get Vineteri!!! Now we need some good recievers...
     
  4. WinnipegPackFan

    WinnipegPackFan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,943
    Ratings:
    +0
    Let me second the motion and add "one happy Brett" :wink:
     
  5. GakkofNorway

    GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Messages:
    2,249
    Ratings:
    +0
    I don't think our FA will be as bad as many thinks, rome wasn't built in 1 day, and the FA doesn't only last for 1 week like the Vikings seem to think :p
     
  6. NCPackFan

    NCPackFan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2006
    Messages:
    28
    Ratings:
    +0
    I want to make a third motion to take Vineteri.

    Then we could move Longwell out.
     
  7. porky88

    porky88 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    3,991
    Ratings:
    +0
    EXACTLY yet people are still mad that Green Bay didn't waste money on over the hill players like Corey Chaveous. TT has done a nice job so far. Now he can't just stop and I don't think he will.
     
  8. chibiabos

    chibiabos Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2005
    Messages:
    398
    Ratings:
    +0
    :eek: Longwell is already the property of The Vikings
     
  9. gopackgo4

    gopackgo4 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    1,080
    Ratings:
    +0
    NOw lets get Vinateri and Julian and I will be a very heppy man
     
  10. Zero2Cool

    Zero2Cool I own a website

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,903
    Ratings:
    +8
    Anyone know where C. Woodson was on this list?
     
  11. WinnipegPackFan

    WinnipegPackFan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,943
    Ratings:
    +0
    Good Question !!!
     
  12. SuperRat

    SuperRat Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Messages:
    617
    Ratings:
    +0
    Woodson is number 17. So we got the number 6, 10, and 17th best free agents.
     
  13. porky88

    porky88 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    3,991
    Ratings:
    +0
    haha who new I would be right.. Added Woodson.. 3 in the top 20. I'd like to see any other team that did that. Of course this is based off of ESPN's rankings. :p
     
  14. Packnic

    Packnic Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,454
    Ratings:
    +6
    TT sucks he is horrible in free agency
     
  15. hoos

    hoos Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    317
    Ratings:
    +0
    Packnic, we would have been better off with Manbearpig!
     
  16. CaliforniaCheez

    CaliforniaCheez Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Messages:
    2,486
    Ratings:
    +0
    I really did not think it was possible to replace Carroll this year.
    I thought it would have to wait given what was available.
    2 offensive linemen and the Packers should be fine next year.

    Ted is not done. August there will be players picked up. Plus with the reduced round of cut downs teams, will go from 65 and their NFL-E exemptions to 53. Ted will find at least one player there.

    As fans we should have the patience of Thompson not the patience of Sherman.
     

Share This Page