Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
To all of you who said "you can't win a title in the nfl without a running game..."
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="net" data-source="post: 346934" data-attributes="member: 200"><p>Sorry, don't really care if you think you don't need a running game. You do. And the Packers did. Starks had 52 yards. Why not ask McCarthy if he wants a running game? He has said all along you need BALANCE. Why have running backs? Because if you don't at least have the THREAT of a running game, they simply put 6 defensive backs out there and your offense is toast.</p><p>Anyone who thinks you don't need a running attack is fooling themselves and the Packers will find that out next season. The D-Coordinators will stop the passing attack eventually, then, what...? You kick 65 yard field goals? You have a deadly accurate passer and at least two outstanding receivers. But to simply say you don't need to run the ball is really, really dumb. There isn't a reputable coach in any league that would say that. Good example is the Detroit game. Detroit took away the passing game, and the running game never got going....and look where it ended up...the Packers last loss this season.</p><p>The Packers didn't need to emphasize the run in THIS GAME. But they will need to improve the run game in 2011.</p><p>Sorry, but your reasoning is flawed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="net, post: 346934, member: 200"] Sorry, don't really care if you think you don't need a running game. You do. And the Packers did. Starks had 52 yards. Why not ask McCarthy if he wants a running game? He has said all along you need BALANCE. Why have running backs? Because if you don't at least have the THREAT of a running game, they simply put 6 defensive backs out there and your offense is toast. Anyone who thinks you don't need a running attack is fooling themselves and the Packers will find that out next season. The D-Coordinators will stop the passing attack eventually, then, what...? You kick 65 yard field goals? You have a deadly accurate passer and at least two outstanding receivers. But to simply say you don't need to run the ball is really, really dumb. There isn't a reputable coach in any league that would say that. Good example is the Detroit game. Detroit took away the passing game, and the running game never got going....and look where it ended up...the Packers last loss this season. The Packers didn't need to emphasize the run in THIS GAME. But they will need to improve the run game in 2011. Sorry, but your reasoning is flawed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
Poppa San
* Team Owner *
Members online
Poppa San
tynimiller
Magooch
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: DoURant
25 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Wi. Mike now in Florida
39 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Poppa San
42 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: jetfixer
58 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 7:18 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
To all of you who said "you can't win a title in the nfl without a running game..."
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top