Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Time To Shut Down Eddie Lacy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HyponGrey" data-source="post: 541812" data-attributes="member: 6441"><p>Lacy is going to get, and rightfully should get 20 carries a week. That's just fact. He does need a more active spell back, though to keep it at just 20. We seriously don't want any long term issues, Eddie has enough of those already with his toe and thumb. I firmly believe had we had Harris available, or Franklin available with Starks, we would have reduced Lacy's carries at the end of the year. The fact that we didn't use Starks speaks volumes about Starks. Personally it seems we were more worried about limiting Starks' carries than we were the guy wearing a boot during the week. Once again, that speaks about Starks. The fact that Lacy was wearing a boot during the week shows that limp was serious, and as conservative as our staff is, we had a rash of returning players that didn't seem coincidental (especially considering how much fire our med staff was under). It's not a stretch to think they may have "relaxed" their standards to keep players on the field for a PR boost.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HyponGrey, post: 541812, member: 6441"] Lacy is going to get, and rightfully should get 20 carries a week. That's just fact. He does need a more active spell back, though to keep it at just 20. We seriously don't want any long term issues, Eddie has enough of those already with his toe and thumb. I firmly believe had we had Harris available, or Franklin available with Starks, we would have reduced Lacy's carries at the end of the year. The fact that we didn't use Starks speaks volumes about Starks. Personally it seems we were more worried about limiting Starks' carries than we were the guy wearing a boot during the week. Once again, that speaks about Starks. The fact that Lacy was wearing a boot during the week shows that limp was serious, and as conservative as our staff is, we had a rash of returning players that didn't seem coincidental (especially considering how much fire our med staff was under). It's not a stretch to think they may have "relaxed" their standards to keep players on the field for a PR boost. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
mradtke66
GreenBaySlacker
Latest posts
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: mradtke66
A moment ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
6 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: milani
23 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:10 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Today at 9:42 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Time To Shut Down Eddie Lacy
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top