Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 836203" data-attributes="member: 10441">I guess we'll see.  There's more to TE usage than just snaps and counts.  I think our TE's will be more productive in this type of offense because we'll line up and run or pass from the same formations.  2 TE's won't always mean run.  I think it will open up opportunities to be used like TE's again.  Our TE's, besides, Graham, hardly saw the field.   And Graham was basically a big bodied WR, like he has been in his career, and he was our 2nd receiving threat behind Adams.  It's not a wonder he got a ton of snaps, but I don't think we used him very well.  Sure they put him on the field and threw him the ball and being the most senior and member of a relatively zero experience collection of pass catchers, I'd have expected him to be a lot more productive and have a lot more opportunities too.  I think the Seahawks threw the ball to Graham more than the Packers did last year. Richard Rodgers had more opportunities a few years ago than Graham had last year.  Not sure if we threw the ball close to 70% of the time or not that year either, which would make that even more significant.  I'm not suggesting MaLF is going to get the TE's over a hundred targets each or anything, but I do think we'll see a shift in the type of production from TE's in this offense.</blockquote>

Total: 714 (members: 3, guests: 711)