Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1065181" data-attributes="member: 10086">I will say this about Coop. This is in no way trying to dismiss anyone wanting to see his full potential because he’s likely to shock some of us.With 491 (55%) snaps he performed at a very high level in 2024. Enough to finish 6th in Rookie of the Year votes. If we pumped Edgerrins’ snaps to match Warner? Here’s a simulated result of Edgerrin playing at Warners 997 snaps. It’s easy match because he played exactly half of Warner’s’ snap count.Edgerrin pace at 997 snaps.2 INT; 46 yards8 Pass Defensed64.9% Pass Comp 78.8% Passer rating2 Forced Fumbles6 Fumbles Recovered7 Sacks174 Tackles (114 Solo)26 Tackles for Loss14 QB hits16 QB pressures6 QB knockdowns.2 Batted PassesNow that’s Cooper at double snaps or exactly Warner time on field. Let’s look at All Pro-1 Fred Warner with 94% or his actuality 998 snaps in 2024.Fred Warner (All Pro-1 Probowl)2 INT; 70 yards7 Pass D79.3% comp; 97.5% Pass rate allow4 FF0 Fumbles Recovered1 Sack131  Tackles (76 Solo)5 Tackles for Loss2 QB hits5 QB pressures1 QB knockdowns.O batted PassesNow both players are used in different capacities and obviously double snaps does not = double production. That said Cooper is just an absolute Specimen. Probably should’ve went back half of Rd1 imo.</blockquote>

Total: 664 (members: 2, guests: 662)