Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="warhawk" data-source="post: 164693" data-attributes="member: 431">I get a kick out of people who try to describe a team inherited by a GM as "their team" as if he kicked all 53 players off and brought all new guys on in '05. It was TT's fault the cap was so badly mismanaged he couldn't breath or that apparantly the contracts of Wahle and Rivera were sealed documents that Sherman was not aware of the dates of expiration.Sherman had no plan on how to deal with these guys nor did he have a respectable backup player to step in. Just "here you go Ted, deal with it."But of course Ted was just supposed to go "****" there, it's fixed. The irony of it is we have people here like you *****in' about how TT handled the offensive line situation and yet here were are today in much better shape than had he pulled some rabbit out of his hat and kept the old guys. Of course we have people like you *****in' anyhow about the transformation of a defense that is ten-fold better than it was when TT got here. This same recipe is what allowed Chicago to pass us by and take over the North. There's no big mystery here. By '05, to a man, their defense was better than ours.But of course "in the end you know you will be right." Right?</blockquote>

Total: 1,197 (members: 4, guests: 1,193)