Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
This Year is Wasted ..Stick With Brett
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="musccy" data-source="post: 28627" data-attributes="member: 219"><p>the picks had little to do w/ Brett being on the run. First, one of the few things the o-line is OK at is pass protection. Going into yesterday, Brett hadn't been sacked in 110 consecutive plays (I think-heard on wtmj)</p><p></p><p>..And, one of Brett's forte's has been throwing on the run, why else would the Pack design some plays where they pull a guard to block for him in the flat as he's rolling?</p><p></p><p>Many ppl agree that Brett was the primary reason the Packers lost yesterday, but many on this board, in the media, and coaching staff are passing the buck and ignoring the problem. What would happen if MS, ahmad carroll, DD, or whomever was clearly the one who was prinicpally responsible for a loss (I'm not blaming this all on Brett...just saying if you had to pick 1 factor, he was the biggest reason)? </p><p></p><p>I don't want to hear the "he has no players" garbage...Brett has been forcing it and jeapordizing the Packers (at times) ever since the Dallas playoff and MN dome games of the early '90s. He has just as much of a problem in big games as ppl suggest MS does...so why should he get a free pass? Bench him...NO!!!...but correct the problem and not allow him to play irresponsibly...YES!!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="musccy, post: 28627, member: 219"] the picks had little to do w/ Brett being on the run. First, one of the few things the o-line is OK at is pass protection. Going into yesterday, Brett hadn't been sacked in 110 consecutive plays (I think-heard on wtmj) ..And, one of Brett's forte's has been throwing on the run, why else would the Pack design some plays where they pull a guard to block for him in the flat as he's rolling? Many ppl agree that Brett was the primary reason the Packers lost yesterday, but many on this board, in the media, and coaching staff are passing the buck and ignoring the problem. What would happen if MS, ahmad carroll, DD, or whomever was clearly the one who was prinicpally responsible for a loss (I'm not blaming this all on Brett...just saying if you had to pick 1 factor, he was the biggest reason)? I don't want to hear the "he has no players" garbage...Brett has been forcing it and jeapordizing the Packers (at times) ever since the Dallas playoff and MN dome games of the early '90s. He has just as much of a problem in big games as ppl suggest MS does...so why should he get a free pass? Bench him...NO!!!...but correct the problem and not allow him to play irresponsibly...YES!!! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DoURant
Schultz
Pkrjones
Latest posts
S
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Schultz
3 minutes ago
Draft Talk
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: Pkrjones
6 minutes ago
Draft Talk
S
Bold Takes-- 2024 Draft Edition
Latest: Schultz
9 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 Packers Top 30 Prospect Visits
Latest: DoURant
44 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Transfer Portal and How It Has Changed College Sports
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:13 AM
College Sports
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
This Year is Wasted ..Stick With Brett
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top