Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2011 Draft Archive
This notion that Ted is different from other GM's when it comes to the draft.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackersRS" data-source="post: 357013" data-attributes="member: 1429"><p>Those were needs, but future needs.</p><p></p><p>We didn't need a QB to groom, not at that point, considering Favre's durability. But we would later.</p><p></p><p>We didn't need DT depth, we had Pickett, Williams, Jenkins and Jolly. But we would in later, with Williams' trade.</p><p></p><p>We didn't need WR depth. We had Driver still playing great, and both Jennins and Jones as potential stars. 3 very good to great receivers is what most teams have, and we had that. We had some quality with Ferguson as well.</p><p></p><p>And, most of all, those were far from the greatest needs. We had much pressing ones during that time, and we didn't SEEM to adress them at the draft.</p><p></p><p>2005 we had seemingly every need possible, but IIRC, replacing the guards was the biggest.</p><p>2007 we needed a WR, S, DL, OL and RB</p><p>2008 we needed DL, S, and OL badly</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackersRS, post: 357013, member: 1429"] Those were needs, but future needs. We didn't need a QB to groom, not at that point, considering Favre's durability. But we would later. We didn't need DT depth, we had Pickett, Williams, Jenkins and Jolly. But we would in later, with Williams' trade. We didn't need WR depth. We had Driver still playing great, and both Jennins and Jones as potential stars. 3 very good to great receivers is what most teams have, and we had that. We had some quality with Ferguson as well. And, most of all, those were far from the greatest needs. We had much pressing ones during that time, and we didn't SEEM to adress them at the draft. 2005 we had seemingly every need possible, but IIRC, replacing the guards was the biggest. 2007 we needed a WR, S, DL, OL and RB 2008 we needed DL, S, and OL badly [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Firethorn1001
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: milani
40 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
41 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: CarryTheG14
41 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
46 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: DoURant
Today at 2:58 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2011 Draft Archive
This notion that Ted is different from other GM's when it comes to the draft.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top