Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Unsung Linchpin of 2023
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1000398" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Can you imagine if we used Jordan Love’s very first NFL appearance and he played great and then got signed to a lucrative, record breaking contract and fully guaranteed? We’d think our GM was crazy.</p><p></p><p>How about if we drafted and signed a Day 1 selection and then cut him after 1 game? We’d think the team was absolutely nutty.</p><p></p><p>I don’t see that 2021 GBP vs KC game any different. I also don’t consider Mahomes first 2017 appearance as a proper measuring tool for his worth.</p><p>Imo evaluation is like a good experiment. It’s imperative to have an adequate sample size before forming a proper evaluation. 1 game is nowhere in the stratosphere of properly forming a valid analysis.</p><p></p><p>So with that thought, it seems logical to me to ask why? Why would a Packer fan use 1 KC game to repeatedly argue how poor Love is? Also why would Captain use the 1/2 Eagles contest as a means to reduce Jordan Love’s solid performance. No. I believe Captain is too smart to say he thinks 1 start is enough evidence to make some grand proclamation. It doesn’t add up unless there is an ulterior motive. So the detective in me is naturally looking for the source of that motivation is all.</p><p></p><p>Now a Captain sympathizer just spoke to he didn’t like the draft selection? Which is fine but odd, because I didn’t initially like the draft choice either. Yet Jordan being drafted (instead of WR) has absolutely 0% bearing in his worth, good or bad. So I guess I’m arguing that imo that sympathizer and Captains evaluation is then biased (due to wanting a WR) If this was a science experiment we’d call that contaminated results. We should evaluate Jordan on a reasonable sample size and not based on the fact we wanted to do the experiment on something else altogether.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1000398, member: 10086"] Can you imagine if we used Jordan Love’s very first NFL appearance and he played great and then got signed to a lucrative, record breaking contract and fully guaranteed? We’d think our GM was crazy. How about if we drafted and signed a Day 1 selection and then cut him after 1 game? We’d think the team was absolutely nutty. I don’t see that 2021 GBP vs KC game any different. I also don’t consider Mahomes first 2017 appearance as a proper measuring tool for his worth. Imo evaluation is like a good experiment. It’s imperative to have an adequate sample size before forming a proper evaluation. 1 game is nowhere in the stratosphere of properly forming a valid analysis. So with that thought, it seems logical to me to ask why? Why would a Packer fan use 1 KC game to repeatedly argue how poor Love is? Also why would Captain use the 1/2 Eagles contest as a means to reduce Jordan Love’s solid performance. No. I believe Captain is too smart to say he thinks 1 start is enough evidence to make some grand proclamation. It doesn’t add up unless there is an ulterior motive. So the detective in me is naturally looking for the source of that motivation is all. Now a Captain sympathizer just spoke to he didn’t like the draft selection? Which is fine but odd, because I didn’t initially like the draft choice either. Yet Jordan being drafted (instead of WR) has absolutely 0% bearing in his worth, good or bad. So I guess I’m arguing that imo that sympathizer and Captains evaluation is then biased (due to wanting a WR) If this was a science experiment we’d call that contaminated results. We should evaluate Jordan on a reasonable sample size and not based on the fact we wanted to do the experiment on something else altogether. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Firethorn1001
RicFlairoftheNFL
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: AKCheese
Today at 12:03 AM
Draft Talk
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 11:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 11:01 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 10:58 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 10:41 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Unsung Linchpin of 2023
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top