Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
the root of the problem ...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hauschild" data-source="post: 250135" data-attributes="member: 1638"><p>No, both did not produce early. Rodgers didn't play for years and Collins didn't play at an NFL caliber until last season. But, it all depends on what one considers "production".</p><p></p><p>TT didn't have to draft Rodgers only to have him sit the bench for 3 years - he could have selected a player that would have provided more production and then figured out a QB situation later.</p><p></p><p>I think you can see that Rodgers is like 90% of other NFL QB's - he's going to go how his offensive line goes. Point being, sure, we've got a perceived "stud" QB, who looked terrible last week because of an offensive line that hasn't been addressed fairly. What if TT stocks the line instead of drafting Rodgers and we have a less-heralded commodity at QB now? Would we be any worse off??? Could we actually be better off???</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hauschild, post: 250135, member: 1638"] No, both did not produce early. Rodgers didn't play for years and Collins didn't play at an NFL caliber until last season. But, it all depends on what one considers "production". TT didn't have to draft Rodgers only to have him sit the bench for 3 years - he could have selected a player that would have provided more production and then figured out a QB situation later. I think you can see that Rodgers is like 90% of other NFL QB's - he's going to go how his offensive line goes. Point being, sure, we've got a perceived "stud" QB, who looked terrible last week because of an offensive line that hasn't been addressed fairly. What if TT stocks the line instead of drafting Rodgers and we have a less-heralded commodity at QB now? Would we be any worse off??? Could we actually be better off??? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: milani
57 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: milani
Today at 5:37 PM
Movies and Entertainment
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Magooch
Today at 4:05 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 2:15 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: CarryTheG14
Today at 11:42 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
the root of the problem ...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top